Permitted Receivers - OneNDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


===Who’s in===
===Who’s in===
*'''[[Professional advisers]]''': Not usually controversial because they are by nature bound by protocols to respect confidentiality and may even buy you legal privilege for whatever that is worth these days.
*'''[[Professional advisers]]''': Not usually controversial because they are by nature bound by professional protocol and [[Fiduciary duty|fiduciary duties]] to respect [[confidentiality]] and may even buy you legal [[privilege]] for whatever that is worth these days.
*'''Employees''': The corporate veil may be impermeable but you do need someone with a head and a beating heart to read and deal with the confidential information on the [[limited company]]’s behalf — but more fearful types may try to restrict which of your employees are in the gang (see below).  
*'''Employees''': The corporate veil may be impermeable but you do need someone with a head, any kind of head, and a beating heart to read and deal with the {{confiprov|confidential information}} on the [[limited company]]’s behalf — but more fearful types may try to restrict which of your employees are in the gang (see below).  
*'''[[Regulator|Regulators]]''' — compulsory disclosure to competent regulatory bodies, courts, and so on. Marginally more controversial is the obligation to disclose at polite but non-binding request of regulators.
*'''[[Regulator|Regulators]]''' — compulsory disclosure to competent regulatory bodies, courts, and so on. Marginally more controversial is the obligation to disclose at polite but non-binding request of regulators.
===Who’s out===
===Who’s out===