Obligations Binding - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdaanat|3(a)(v)|1992|3(a)(v)}} | {{isdaanat|3(a)(v)|1992|3(a)(v)}} | ||
===“any {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} to which it is a party”=== | |||
Now given that a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} will generally be a deed of [[guarantee]], [[letter of credit|Letter of Credit]] or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, ''third party'' to which a {{isdaprov|Party}} in whose favour it is provided will not a “party” — and no, a {{isdaprov|Credit support Annex}} is ''not'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, however much it might ''sound'' like one, one might wonder what the point would be of mentioning, in this sub-section, {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}s to which a {{isdaprov|Party}} is ''party''. | Now given that a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} will generally be a deed of [[guarantee]], [[letter of credit|Letter of Credit]] or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, ''third party'' to which a {{isdaprov|Party}} in whose favour it is provided will not a “party” — and no, a {{isdaprov|Credit support Annex}} is ''not'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, however much it might ''sound'' like one, one might wonder what the point would be of mentioning, in this sub-section, {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}s to which a {{isdaprov|Party}} is ''party''. | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
Hang on: Why are you looking at me like that? | Hang on: Why are you looking at me like that? | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} |
Revision as of 17:44, 21 June 2019
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
“any Credit Support Document to which it is a party”
Now given that a Credit Support Document will generally be a deed of guarantee, Letter of Credit or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, third party to which a Party in whose favour it is provided will not a “party” — and no, a Credit support Annex is not a Credit Support Document, however much it might sound like one, one might wonder what the point would be of mentioning, in this sub-section, Credit Support Documents to which a Party is party.
Well — and this might come as a surprise, if you’re an ISDA ingénue; old lags won’t bat an eyelid — there isn’t much point.
But does anyone, other than the most insufferable pedant, really care? I mean why would you write a snippy wiki article about some fluffy but fundamentally harmless language, unless you were a stone cold bore?
Hang on: Why are you looking at me like that?