From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{aifmdanat|21(13)}} | | {{aifmdanat|21(13)}} |
| {{Aifmddepositarydelegation}} | | |
| | |
| | {{sa}} |
| | *The {{aifmdprov|Depositary}} regime under AIFMD generally |
| | *{{aifmdprov|21(11)}} - {{aifmdprov|criteria for delegating depositary functions to third parties}} <br> |
| | *{{aifmdprov|21(12)}} - {{aifmdprov|Liability for loss of assets}} <br> |
| | *{{aifmdprov|21(13)}} - {{aifmdprov|Liability not affected by delegation except in certain circumstances}} <br> |
| {{ref}} | | {{ref}} |
Revision as of 07:56, 31 July 2019
AIFMD Anatomy™
{{{2}}} In a Nutshell™ Section 21(13):
view template
Full text
This is an unoffical transcription, may be wrong, buggered up, out of date etc. You should Google the original.
21(13). The depositary’s liability shall not be affected by any delegation referred to in paragraph 21(11).
Notwithstanding the first subparagraph of this paragraph, in case of a loss of financial instruments held in custody by a third party pursuant to paragraph 21(11), the depositary may discharge itself of liability if it can prove that:
- (a) all requirements for the delegation of its custody tasks set out in the second subparagraph of paragraph 21(11) are met;
- (b) a written contract between the depositary and the third party expressly transfers the liability of the depositary to that third party and makes it possible for the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF to make a claim against the third party in respect of the loss of financial instruments or for the depositary to make such a claim on their behalf; and
- (c) a written contract between the depositary and the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF, expressly allows a discharge of the depositary’s liability and establishes the objective reason to contract such a discharge.
|
view template
|
See also
References