Business Day - 2006 ISDA Definition: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In the abstract it seems, doesn’t it, such a simple idea. | In the abstract it seems, doesn’t it, such a simple idea. | ||
But you know by now that the high-powered analytical microscope of an [[ISDA drafting committee]] can turn the most basic intellectual frippery into a cascade of text, especially where, at the edges, there are points of ambiguity | But you know by now that the high-powered analytical microscope of an [[ISDA drafting committee]] can turn the most basic intellectual frippery into a cascade of text, especially where, at the edges, there are points of ambiguity. | ||
And here the committee applies the range of its arsenal: [[incluso]]s, [[relevant]]ses, [[applicable]]s, [[(s)]]es, [[in accordance with]], [[in respect of]], and a few [[on or by reference to]]s in the closing, dying stages, when the indefatigable lungs of even those splendid draftspeoples are all but spent, their owners lying blue on the carpet. | And, in a {{t|contract}}ual framework as eager as ISDA’s is to span the globe, be assured there ''will'' be ambiguity, should you want to judge ''where'', or by reference to ''what'' local entrepreneurs are expecting to turn up for work. A principal financial center for whom? A payer? Payee? Sender? Receiver? And for the purposes of doing what? Paying? Simply being in the office to receive your correspondence? | ||
And, aye, that is before we even get to that rebellious [[sui generis]] the [[Euro]], which doesn’t ''have'' a [[principal financial center]] (or, at any rate, has dozens of the buggers, each with its own cultural peculiarities and idiosyncratic obsessions of rest, relaxation and days off) and which has thus developed its own [[TARGET|magical settlement system]], ignorant of its bankers’ diverse recreational urges, to keep the financial gears of the great federal project oiled and turning. | |||
And here the [[ISDA drafting committee|committee]] applies the range of its arsenal: [[incluso]]s, [[relevant]]ses, [[applicable]]s, [[(s)]]es, [[in accordance with]], [[in respect of]], and a few [[on or by reference to]]s in the closing, dying stages, when the indefatigable lungs of even those splendid draftspeoples are all but spent, their owners lying blue on the carpet. | |||
So you might, if reaching for something easy, refer instead to the comparatively blunt concept of a ''{{isdadefsprov|Banking Day}}'', where the only referent is the city to which you refer, it being understood that all cities have banks, and all bankers like to have weekends and holidays. | So you might, if reaching for something easy, refer instead to the comparatively blunt concept of a ''{{isdadefsprov|Banking Day}}'', where the only referent is the city to which you refer, it being understood that all cities have banks, and all bankers like to have weekends and holidays. |
Revision as of 15:16, 3 October 2019
|
In the abstract it seems, doesn’t it, such a simple idea.
But you know by now that the high-powered analytical microscope of an ISDA drafting committee can turn the most basic intellectual frippery into a cascade of text, especially where, at the edges, there are points of ambiguity.
And, in a contractual framework as eager as ISDA’s is to span the globe, be assured there will be ambiguity, should you want to judge where, or by reference to what local entrepreneurs are expecting to turn up for work. A principal financial center for whom? A payer? Payee? Sender? Receiver? And for the purposes of doing what? Paying? Simply being in the office to receive your correspondence?
And, aye, that is before we even get to that rebellious sui generis the Euro, which doesn’t have a principal financial center (or, at any rate, has dozens of the buggers, each with its own cultural peculiarities and idiosyncratic obsessions of rest, relaxation and days off) and which has thus developed its own magical settlement system, ignorant of its bankers’ diverse recreational urges, to keep the financial gears of the great federal project oiled and turning.
And here the committee applies the range of its arsenal: inclusos, relevantses, applicables, (s)es, in accordance with, in respect of, and a few on or by reference tos in the closing, dying stages, when the indefatigable lungs of even those splendid draftspeoples are all but spent, their owners lying blue on the carpet.
So you might, if reaching for something easy, refer instead to the comparatively blunt concept of a Banking Day, where the only referent is the city to which you refer, it being understood that all cities have banks, and all bankers like to have weekends and holidays.