Email disclaimer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}A window into the soul of your correspondent (or, where harnessed to the [[great steampunk machine]] of a multinational corporation, that entity’s blackened soul). It can be long, or short; sombre or witty; comprehensive or general, but it will be there: the [[email disclaimer]]: an extract of text, appended to every outbound communication, canvassing any [[one or more]] of the following subjects: | {{g}}A window into the soul of your correspondent (or, where harnessed to the [[great steampunk machine]] of a multinational corporation, that entity’s blackened soul). It can be long, or short; sombre or witty; comprehensive or general, but it will be there: the [[email disclaimer]]: an extract of text, appended to every outbound communication, canvassing any [[one or more]] of the following subjects: | ||
*Its [[confidentiality]] | ===What it is=== | ||
*Its [[copyright]] | *Its [[confidentiality]] — it won’t be: you don’t protect confidences by randomly emailing them to people; | ||
*Its [[copyright]] — it might be, but the value is likely nil: the world is awash with emails just like yours; | |||
*Its [[privilege]] (despite its protestations, misdirected emails will rarely be legally privileged) | *Its [[privilege]] (despite its protestations, misdirected emails will rarely be legally privileged) | ||
*Its potential inaccuracy | *Its potential inaccuracy — a cute counterpoint to its value as intellectual property: “it is copyright, but probably bullshit anyway”; | ||
*Its epidemiological virulence; | *Its epidemiological virulence; | ||
*The receiver’s moral duty to destroy it if sent in error. | *The receiver’s moral — but (Law of Contracts 101 check: ''not'' legal) duty to destroy it if sent in error. | ||
===What it is not=== | |||
* | A fulsome [[email disclaimer]] will also wax lengthily about what it is ''not'': a subject, of course, on which any [[lawyer]] can joyfully extemporise for as long as there are cattle still out on manoeuvres: | ||
* | *It is not professional advice (as if that won’t be dolefully apparent on its face) | ||
* | *Nor is it an offer or solicitation of an offer — and IN ANY CASE NOT TO [[RESIDENTS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE]]; | ||
*Nor a recommendation to do anything or not do anything (Stop and think about this juicy [[double negative]] for a while: “We are ''not'' telling you ''not'' to do anything”.) And what kind of person acts instinctively on as recommendation from an email anyway? (Don’t answer that: it is most of you.) | |||
All of this served up in the certain knowledge no person having enough adult literacy to comprehend an email disclaimer would — or even could — be dim-witted or bored enough to | All of this served up in the certain knowledge no person having enough adult literacy to comprehend an [[email disclaimer]] would — or even ''could'' — be dim-witted or bored enough to read it, much less care about what it says. | ||
Which begs the question: what do we think we are achieving with an [[email disclaimer]]? Which part of [[Chicken-licken|the sky would fall upon our heads]] were it not there? | Which begs the question: what do we think we are achieving with an [[email disclaimer]]? Which part of [[Chicken-licken|the sky would fall upon our heads]] were it not there? | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[This email and its contents are confidential and may be privileged]] | |||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 20 May 2020
|
A window into the soul of your correspondent (or, where harnessed to the great steampunk machine of a multinational corporation, that entity’s blackened soul). It can be long, or short; sombre or witty; comprehensive or general, but it will be there: the email disclaimer: an extract of text, appended to every outbound communication, canvassing any one or more of the following subjects:
What it is
- Its confidentiality — it won’t be: you don’t protect confidences by randomly emailing them to people;
- Its copyright — it might be, but the value is likely nil: the world is awash with emails just like yours;
- Its privilege (despite its protestations, misdirected emails will rarely be legally privileged)
- Its potential inaccuracy — a cute counterpoint to its value as intellectual property: “it is copyright, but probably bullshit anyway”;
- Its epidemiological virulence;
- The receiver’s moral — but (Law of Contracts 101 check: not legal) duty to destroy it if sent in error.
What it is not
A fulsome email disclaimer will also wax lengthily about what it is not: a subject, of course, on which any lawyer can joyfully extemporise for as long as there are cattle still out on manoeuvres:
- It is not professional advice (as if that won’t be dolefully apparent on its face)
- Nor is it an offer or solicitation of an offer — and IN ANY CASE NOT TO RESIDENTS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE;
- Nor a recommendation to do anything or not do anything (Stop and think about this juicy double negative for a while: “We are not telling you not to do anything”.) And what kind of person acts instinctively on as recommendation from an email anyway? (Don’t answer that: it is most of you.)
All of this served up in the certain knowledge no person having enough adult literacy to comprehend an email disclaimer would — or even could — be dim-witted or bored enough to read it, much less care about what it says.
Which begs the question: what do we think we are achieving with an email disclaimer? Which part of the sky would fall upon our heads were it not there?