Does not compute: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|devil|}}What portion of the great, massed oeuvre or executed legal verbiage owes its place in that canon to the failure or refusal of one party to understand what the..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}}What portion of the great, massed oeuvre or executed legal [[verbiage]] owes its place in that canon to the failure or refusal of one party to understand what the legal contract is trying to do, or the basic principles of the commercial law behind it, and the other party not wishing to [[die in a ditch]] about to get the concept across? | {{a|devil|}}What portion of the great, massed oeuvre or executed legal [[verbiage]] owes its place in that canon to the failure or refusal of one party to understand what the legal contract is trying to do, or the basic principles of the commercial law behind it, and the other party not wishing to [[die in a ditch]] about to get the concept across? | ||
How much of our discourse, that is to say, is basically conditioned by ignorance? | How much of our discourse, that is to say, is basically conditioned by ''ignorance''? | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]] | *[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]] | ||
*[[ | *[[Verbiage]] | ||
*[[Stuff you should know]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:35, 25 November 2021
|
What portion of the great, massed oeuvre or executed legal verbiage owes its place in that canon to the failure or refusal of one party to understand what the legal contract is trying to do, or the basic principles of the commercial law behind it, and the other party not wishing to die in a ditch about to get the concept across?
How much of our discourse, that is to say, is basically conditioned by ignorance?