Template:Csa 2(b) summ

Calculating {{{{{1}}}|Delivery Amount}}s and {{{{{1}}}|Return Amount}}s

Differences between 1995 CSA and 2016 VM CSA

Under a 2016 VM CSA there is no Independent Amount or Threshold, so there is no need for a Credit Support Amount (which is Exposure adjusted by applicable Independent Amounts and Thresholds) — everything keys off the plain old Exposure.

Unless, that is, you have retrofitted your 2016 VM CSA to include Independent Amounts. The below assumes you have done that. Because some genius in your credit department will have decided this is really important. If you haven’t, it is a bit easier: just substitute “Credit Support Amount” for “Exposure”. For more on this stimulating topic, see Credit Support Amount (VM/IA).

{{{{{1}}}|Delivery Amount}}s

First: work out your {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Amount}}. This is:

{{{{{1}}}|Transferee}}’s {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}} + Net {{{{{1}}}|Independent Amount}}s (IF ANY)

Second: calculate the {{{{{1}}}|Value}} of the {{{{{1}}}|Transferor}}’s {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Balance}}. This is basically the prevailing value of the {{{{{1}}}|Eligible Credit Support}} (and income on it) that the {{{{{1}}}|Transferor}} has ponied up at that time.
Third: Deduct the {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Balance}} from the {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Amount}}. Fourth: If the difference from the sum you did in (3):

is less than zero, KEEP QUIET. If you are lucky, the other guy won’t ask you for a {{{{{1}}}|Return Amount}}.

is more than zero but less than the {{{{{1}}}|Minimum Transfer Amount}}, also KEEP QUIET. No {{{{{1}}}|Delivery Amount}} for you today, because you haven’t exceeded the {{{{{1}}}|Minimum Transfer Amount}}, so you are not entitled to one.

is more than the {{{{{1}}}|Minimum Transfer Amount}} you can demand the whole amount (I.e., not just the bit over the {{{{{1}}}|MTA}}).

{{{{{1}}}|Return Amount}}s

Basically the converse of a {{{{{1}}}|Delivery Amount}}. In this case you deduct the {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Amount}} from the {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Balance}}.

What about in-flight Credit Support deliveries?

So yesterday you met a margin call by delivering a bond the standard settlement cycle for which means it won’t arrive till the day after tomorrow. How is this “in-flight collateral” treated for today’s margin call?

It’s treated as if you have already made it. This is the significance of the parenthetical:

“(adjusted to include any prior Delivery Amount and to exclude any prior Return Amount, the transfer of which, in either case, has not yet been completed and for which the relevant Settlement Day falls on or after such Valuation Date).”

However, if your counterparty fails in the meantime (before the bond has settled, and assuming ultimately it never does), it would count as an Unpaid Amount which would factor into your close-out calculation.

At first, this seems odd, but the risk is a time value risk associated with the collateral, not a counterparty risk per se. You accepted it when you agreed to Eligible Credit Support with a long settlement cycle in the first place. If you don’t want that time-value risk, don’t agree to collateral with a long settlement cycle.

Picturesque speech

Bonus learning for free: In arithmetic, a sum being subtracted is the “subtrahend” and the sum it is being subtracted from is the “minuend”.