Counterparts and Confirmations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdasnap|9(e)}} | {{isdasnap|9(e)}} | ||
{{comm}} | |||
Note the addition of [[e-mail]] to the 2002 version. this caused all kinds of fear and loathing amongst the judiciary, when asked about it, as can be seen in the frightful case of {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}} | Note the addition of [[e-mail]] to the 2002 version. this caused all kinds of fear and loathing amongst the judiciary, when asked about it, as can be seen in the frightful case of {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}. | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*[[Counterparts]] | |||
*[[Greenclose]] | |||
{{anat|isda}} | {{anat|isda}} |
Revision as of 11:54, 1 March 2017
In gory detail
1992 ISDA
|
2002 ISDA
|
Commentary
Note the addition of e-mail to the 2002 version. this caused all kinds of fear and loathing amongst the judiciary, when asked about it, as can be seen in the frightful case of Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc.
See also