Litigation lawyer: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
An in-house litigation team is basically the complaints division of the firm. Be wary when these people wield inordinate influence. In recent times, like its equivalent in the ''Sirius Cybernetics Corporation'', litigation teams have gone from half a junior lawyer, on flexi-time, between spells of maternity leave, to fully weaponised Death Stars of fusty, naturally censorious solicitors with no appetite to make any call or take any risk, however remote.
An in-house [[litigation]] team is basically the [[complaints department|complaints division]] of the firm. Be wary when these people wield inordinate influence. In recent times, like its equivalent in the ''Sirius Cybernetics Corporation'', litigation teams have gone from half a junior lawyer, on flexi-time, between spells of maternity leave, to fully weaponised Death Stars of fusty, naturally censorious [[Mediocre lawyer|solicitors]] with no appetite to make any call or take any risk, however remote.
 
And that’s assuming [[litigation lawyer]]s really are glorified customer complaint reps. The [[Litigation|alternative]] is worse.


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Chicken licken]]
*[[Chicken licken]]
{{draft}}
{{draft}}

Revision as of 14:49, 7 August 2017

An in-house litigation team is basically the complaints division of the firm. Be wary when these people wield inordinate influence. In recent times, like its equivalent in the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, litigation teams have gone from half a junior lawyer, on flexi-time, between spells of maternity leave, to fully weaponised Death Stars of fusty, naturally censorious solicitors with no appetite to make any call or take any risk, however remote.

And that’s assuming litigation lawyers really are glorified customer complaint reps. The alternative is worse.

See also