Settlement netting: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat|isda|2(c)|2002}} | |||
In the context of an {{isdama}} is the ability, vouchsaved in Section {{isdaprov|2(c)}} of the {{isdama}}, to offset cashflows due between parties to the agreement on the same day in the same currency but in respect of different {{isdaprov|Transactions}}. | In the context of an {{isdama}} is the ability, vouchsaved in Section {{isdaprov|2(c)}} of the {{isdama}}, to offset cashflows due between parties to the agreement on the same day in the same currency but in respect of different {{isdaprov|Transactions}}. | ||
===Caution=== | ===Caution=== | ||
Settlement {{tag|netting}} should not be, but routinely is, confused with the much more drastic [[close-out netting]], which is the termination of all outstanding transactions and the calculation of a single net {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} under section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} of the {{isdama}}, which is something that only happens in the unhappy situation that one or other party has terminated following an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} under Section {{isdaprov|5(a)}} or a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} under Section {{isdaprov|5(b)}}. A {{tag|trick for young players}} there. | Settlement {{tag|netting}} should not be, but routinely is, confused with the much more drastic [[close-out netting]], which is the termination of all outstanding transactions and the calculation of a single net {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} under section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} of the {{isdama}}, which is something that only happens in the unhappy situation that one or other party has terminated following an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} under Section {{isdaprov|5(a)}} or a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} under Section {{isdaprov|5(b)}}. A {{tag|trick for young players}} there. | ||
Revision as of 09:43, 1 February 2018
ISDA Anatomy™
2002 ISDA
by each party to the other, then, on such date, each party’s obligation to make payment of any such amount will be automatically satisfied and discharged and, if the aggregate amount that would otherwise have been payable by one party exceeds the aggregate amount that would otherwise have been payable by the other party, replaced by an obligation upon the party by which the larger aggregate amount would have been payable to pay to the other party the excess of the larger aggregate amount over the smaller aggregate amount. The parties may elect in respect of two or more Transactions that a net amount and payment obligation will be determined in respect of all amounts payable on the same date in the same currency in respect of those Transactions, regardless of whether such amounts are payable in respect of the same Transaction. The election may be made in the Schedule or any Confirmation by specifying that “Multiple Transaction Payment Netting” applies to the Transactions identified as being subject to the election (in which case clause 2(c)(ii) above will not apply to such Transactions). If Multiple Transaction Payment Netting is applicable to Transactions, it will apply to those Transactions with effect from the starting date specified in the Schedule or such Confirmation, or, if a starting date is not specified in the Schedule or such Confirmation, the starting date otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. This election may be made separately for different groups of Transactions and will apply separately to each pairing of Offices through which the parties make and receive payments or deliveries.
|
In the context of an ISDA Master Agreement is the ability, vouchsaved in Section 2(c) of the ISDA Master Agreement, to offset cashflows due between parties to the agreement on the same day in the same currency but in respect of different Transactions.
Caution
Settlement netting should not be, but routinely is, confused with the much more drastic close-out netting, which is the termination of all outstanding transactions and the calculation of a single net Early Termination Amount under section 6(e) of the ISDA Master Agreement, which is something that only happens in the unhappy situation that one or other party has terminated following an Event of Default under Section 5(a) or a Termination Event under Section 5(b). A trick for young players there.