Misrepresentation - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdaanat|5(a)(iv)}} | {{isdaanat|5(a)(iv)}} | ||
What is a “[[material]]” respect? This is key, since some of the general representations ({{isdaprov|Consents}}, for example) are quite wide, and in this world of regulatory perma-change, the risk that one is, for example, outside technical compliance with a new regulation as it is implemented, notwithstanding a competent [[regulator]]’s informal indication that no action will be taken if you get your skates on and remediate quickly — it happened for {{t|MiFID II}} as thousands of financial firms raced headlong at the brick wall of that 3 January 2017 implementation date<ref>[[Swiss stay]] too, for that matter.</ref> but it seems reasonable to suppose that materially must somehow impact your ability to carry out your obligations under a Transaction or the {{isdama}}<ref>Other than the representation itself, of course. That would be meta, and actually a bit of a [[strange loop]].</ref>. | What is a “[[material]]” respect? This is key, since some of the general representations ({{isdaprov|Consents}}, for example) are quite wide, and in this world of regulatory perma-change, the risk that one is, for example, outside technical compliance with a new regulation as it is implemented, notwithstanding a competent [[regulator]]’s informal indication that no action will be taken if you get your skates on and remediate quickly — it happened for {{t|MiFID II}} as thousands of financial firms raced headlong at the brick wall of that 3 January 2017 implementation date<ref>[[Swiss stay]] too, for that matter.</ref> but it seems reasonable to suppose that materially must somehow impact your ability to carry out your obligations under a Transaction or the {{isdama}}<ref>Other than the representation itself, of course. That would be meta, and actually a bit of a [[strange loop]].</ref>. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Consents}} | |||
{{ref}} |
Revision as of 15:07, 16 July 2019
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
What is a “material” respect? This is key, since some of the general representations (Consents, for example) are quite wide, and in this world of regulatory perma-change, the risk that one is, for example, outside technical compliance with a new regulation as it is implemented, notwithstanding a competent regulator’s informal indication that no action will be taken if you get your skates on and remediate quickly — it happened for MiFID II as thousands of financial firms raced headlong at the brick wall of that 3 January 2017 implementation date[1] but it seems reasonable to suppose that materially must somehow impact your ability to carry out your obligations under a Transaction or the ISDA Master Agreement[2].
See also
References
- ↑ Swiss stay too, for that matter.
- ↑ Other than the representation itself, of course. That would be meta, and actually a bit of a strange loop.