Default - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{csaanat|6|1995}} | {{csaanat|6|1995}} | ||
{{Csa default capsule| | {{Csa default capsule|csa}} | ||
===Why {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s and not {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s?=== | ===Why {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s and not {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s?=== |
Revision as of 15:26, 3 January 2020
ISDA 1995 English Law Credit Support Annex
|
Why Unpaid Amounts and not Close-out Amounts?
The 1995 CSA is technically a Transaction under the ISDA Master Agreement in its own right — that is deep ISDA lore — but it is still a weird Transaction, and the standard “replacement cost” method of valuation doesn’t work brilliantly: rather than having defined payments upfront, each of which can be valued and discounted back to now to reveal a present value, payment obligations under a 1995 CSA depend on the future performance of the other Transactions in the portfolio under your ISDA Master Agreement. So good luck determining the replacement value of something like that.
But the good news is you don’t have to: the Credit Support Balance isn’t calculated by reference to its own discounted future cashflows: rather, it is just the inverse of the aggregate present value of all the other Transactions under the ISDA. So the “replacement cost” on any day is just the prevailing value of the Credit Support Balance. It is therefore easier to treat that as an Unpaid Amount (none of this tedious mucking about with replacement costs and so on). But that means you have to deem the Close-Out Amount[1] as zero.
Including “comprehensive” Termination Events
Consider expanding of the Default provision under Paragraph 6 of the CSA to include “Termination Events where all Transactions are Affected Transactions”. This is as per Section 3.2 of the 2001 ISDA Margin Provisions which recommend that Paragraph 6 of the CSA should apply where all Transactions are closed out following an Event of Default or “Specified Condition” — the latter of which is defined to include the Termination Events listed under the ISDA Master Agreement. It is likely that all Transactions would be Affected Transactions should a Credit Event Upon Merger or Additional Termination Event occur.
See also
References
- ↑ Or Market Quotation/Loss, if under a 1992 ISDA.Spoddy point: the definition of Loss in the 1992 ISDA includes the “Unpaid Amount” concept in the definition: “Loss includes losses and costs (or gains) in respect of any payment or delivery required to have been made (assuming satisfaction of each applicable condition precedent) on or before the relevant Early Termination Date and not made...”