Specified Information - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{isdaanat|4(a)}} | ||
Not actually a defined term under the {{isdama}} but merely a capitalised heading. In [[Amwell J|my]] book capitalising a heading is borderline illiteracy, but ISDA lawyers feel differently about it and I have learned which battles to pick. But at any rate the {{isdaprov|Specified Information}} is that stuff set out in the {{gmslaprov|Schedule}} at {{isdaprov|Part 3}}. | Not actually a defined term under the {{isdama}} but merely a capitalised heading. In [[Amwell J|my]] book capitalising a heading is borderline illiteracy, but ISDA lawyers feel differently about it and I have learned which battles to pick. But at any rate the {{isdaprov|Specified Information}} is that stuff set out in the {{gmslaprov|Schedule}} at {{isdaprov|Part 3}}. | ||
Revision as of 11:35, 18 January 2020
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
Not actually a defined term under the ISDA Master Agreement but merely a capitalised heading. In my book capitalising a heading is borderline illiteracy, but ISDA lawyers feel differently about it and I have learned which battles to pick. But at any rate the Specified Information is that stuff set out in the Schedule at Part 3.
Not providing documents for delivery is an Event of Default ... eventually
The importance of promptly sending required documents for delivery goes as follows:
- By dint of Section {{{{{1}}}|4(a)}} you agree to furnish each other {{{{{1}}}|Specified Information}} set out in {{{{{1}}}|Part 3}} of the {{{{{1}}}|Schedule}}.
- By dint of Section {{{{{1}}}|5(a)(ii)}} if you don’t then that can be a {{{{{1}}}|Breach of Agreement}} {{{{{1}}}|Event of Default}} (Section {{{{{1}}}|5(a)(ii)}}). Be warned: you must pursue a tortured chain of nested double negatives and carefully parse the interplay between Sections {{{{{1}}}|4(a)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(a)(ii)}} to grasp this, but it is true.
- But, Section {{{{{1}}}|5(a)(ii)}} imposes a thirty freaking day grace period following notice before a {{{{{1}}}|Breach of Agreement}} counts as an {{{{{1}}}|Event of Default}} allowing termination. (A {{{{{1}}}|Failure to Pay or Deliver}} is excluded from that definition, by the way, because it has its own EOD with a much tighter grace period).
- So if you need a document “furnished” urgently and can’t wait a month for it (you might not, if you are a credit officer and it is a monthly NAV statement, for example) then you must upgrade a simple {{{{{1}}}|5(a)(ii)}} {{{{{1}}}|Breach of Agreement}} to a full-blown {{{{{1}}}|Additional Termination Event}}.