Obligations Binding - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Business at the front; party at the back. | Business at the front; party at the back. | ||
Now given that a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} will generally be a deed of [[guarantee]], [[letter of credit|Letter of Credit]] or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, ''third party'' to which a Party in whose favour it is provided will not ''be'' a “party” — and no, an | Now given that a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} will generally be a deed of [[guarantee]], [[letter of credit|Letter of Credit]] or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, ''third party'' to which a Party in whose favour it is provided will not ''be'' a “party” — and no, an {{csa}} is ''not'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, however much it might ''sound'' like one<ref>Of course, the {{nycsa}} ''is'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}. Because it just is.</ref>, one might wonder what the point would be of mentioning, in this sub-section, {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}s to which a {{isdaprov|Party}} is ''party''. | ||
Well — and this might come as a surprise, if you’re an [[ISDA ingénue]]; old lags won’t bat an eyelid — there isn’t much point. | Well — and this might come as a surprise, if you’re an [[ISDA ingénue]]; old lags won’t bat an eyelid — there isn’t much point. | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} | *{{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} | ||
{{ref}} |
Revision as of 17:48, 14 February 2020
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
“any Credit Support Document to which it is a party”
Business at the front; party at the back.
Now given that a Credit Support Document will generally be a deed of guarantee, Letter of Credit or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, third party to which a Party in whose favour it is provided will not be a “party” — and no, an 1995 CSA is not a Credit Support Document, however much it might sound like one[1], one might wonder what the point would be of mentioning, in this sub-section, Credit Support Documents to which a Party is party.
Well — and this might come as a surprise, if you’re an ISDA ingénue; old lags won’t bat an eyelid — there isn’t much point.
But does anyone, other than the most insufferable pedant, really care? I mean why would you write a snippy wiki article about some fluffy but fundamentally harmless language, unless you were a stone cold bore?
Hang on: Why are you looking at me like that?
See also
References
- ↑ Of course, the 1994 NY CSA is a Credit Support Document. Because it just is.