Innocent Party - 1992 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 11:55, 18 March 2020

ISDA Anatomy™

Index: Click ᐅ to expand:

Navigation

See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.

The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject	2002 (wikitext)	1992 (wikitext)	1987 (wikitext)
Preamble	Pre	Pre	Pre
Interpretation	1	1	1
Obligns/Payment	2	2	2
Representations	3	3	3
Agreements	4	4	4
EODs & Term Events	5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUST • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • FM • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM • ATE	5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUST • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM • ATE	5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUSS • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM
Early Termination	6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations; Payment Date • Payments on ET • Set-off	6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations • Payments on ET • Set-off	6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations • Payments on ET
Transfer	7	7	7
Contractual Currency	8	8	8
Miscellaneous	9	9	9
Offices; Multibranch Parties	10	10	10
Expenses	11	11	11
Notices	12	12	12
Governing Law	13	13	13
Definitions	14	14	14
Schedule	Schedule	Schedule	Schedule
Termination Provisions	Part 1	Part 1	Part 1
Tax Representations	Part 2	Part 2	Part 2
Documents for Delivery	Part 3	Part 3	Part 3
Miscellaneous	Part 4	Part 4	Part 4
Other Provisions	Part 5	Part 5	Part 5

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

This isn’t a sanctioned ISDA definition, but it should be. It is the JC’s cheeky shorthand for “a Non-defaulting Party or a Non-affected Party, as the case may be”.

It seems so simple when you put it like that, doesn’t it.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{subst:Innocent Party - ISDA Provision}}
+{{a|isda|}}This isn’t a sanctioned ISDA definition, but it should be. It is the [[JC]]’s cheeky shorthand for “a {{isda92prov|Non-defaulting Party}} or a {{isda92prov|Non-affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”.
+It seems so simple when you put it like that, doesn’t it.
+{{sa}}
+*{{isda92prov|Defaulting Party}}
+*{{isda92prov|Non-Defaulting Party}}
+*{{isda92prov|Affected Party}}
+*{{isda92prov|Non-Affected Party}}