Design principles: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}
{{a|devil|}}
*[[Know your purpose]]
*[[Know your purpose]]
*[[Assume there will be accidents]]: The role of the risk manager is to know where the risks are concentrated, not to be satisfied there are no risks. If your [[RAG status]] has been uniformly green at every [[opco]] for the last ten years you should get your coat. Because either there ''is no'' [[risk]], so what are you even doing chairing an [[opco]], or you are flat-out delusional, so someone ''else'' is needed.   
*[[Assume there will be accidents]]: The role of the risk manager is to know where the risks are concentrated, not to be satisfied there are no risks. If your [[RAG status]] has been uniformly green at every [[opco]] for the last ten years you should [[get your coat]]. Because either there ''is no'' [[risk]], so what are you even doing chairing an [[opco]], or you are flat-out delusional, so someone ''else'' is needed.   
*[[Design for average people]]: be realistic about your people's capability: they will be, on average, ''average''.
*[[Design for average people]]: be realistic about your people’s capability: they will be, on average, ''average''.
*[[Iterate]]
*[[Open source]]: don’t seek [[rent]].
*[[Amplify signal, minimise noise]]
*[[Amplify signal, minimise noise]]
*[[Know your client]]  ↔  [[Be personal]]
*[[Know your client]]  ↔  [[Be personal]]

Revision as of 14:06, 21 December 2020

In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


Antifragile

See also