Public domain: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Version one of the [[OneNDA]] uses the expression “public domain”. | Version one of the [[OneNDA]] uses the expression “public domain”. | ||
Experienced hands will not be surprised to hear this is a cue for those who take pleasure from such things, to raise a technical objection. | Experienced hands will not be surprised to hear this is a cue for those who take pleasure from such things, to raise a technical objection. This is too narrow! This means only information that is not protected by patent or copyright is excluded from the confidentiality obligation! Indeed, it makes no commercial sense at all: patent or copyright protection is only really meaningful where information ''is'' public: if it is not, it is hard too see how anyone can copy it. |
Revision as of 08:29, 10 September 2021
NDA Anatomy™
|
Public domain
/ˈpʌblɪk dəʊˈmeɪn/ (n.)
WIthout wishing to rip off the Cambridge Dictionary — but hang it, it is in the public domain,[1] at least according to its own definition:
“if information is in the public domain, it is available for everyone to see or know about”
That is the colloquial use: “public domain” is really just a pompous way of saying “public”.
But “public domain” also has a technical, narrower definition, that hails from the law of copyright: information that is “in the public domain” consists of all creative work, which could be protected by intellectual property rights, but which is not, whether because those rights have expired, been forfeited, waived, or for some other reason just don’t apply.
Version one of the OneNDA uses the expression “public domain”.
Experienced hands will not be surprised to hear this is a cue for those who take pleasure from such things, to raise a technical objection. This is too narrow! This means only information that is not protected by patent or copyright is excluded from the confidentiality obligation! Indeed, it makes no commercial sense at all: patent or copyright protection is only really meaningful where information is public: if it is not, it is hard too see how anyone can copy it.