Template:Confi basic structure: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===what’s in an NDA== | ===what’s in an [[NDA]]=== | ||
Let’s be blunt about this: there is a special place in hell for [[legal eagle|any advisor]] who serves up a confidentiality agreement more than 3 pages long. Even three pages is purgatorially tedious. GET TO THE POINT. It’s a goddamn [[NDA]], not the sale of your soul. | Let’s be blunt about this: there is a special place in hell for [[legal eagle|any advisor]] who serves up a confidentiality agreement more than 3 pages long. Even three pages is purgatorially tedious. GET TO THE POINT. It’s a goddamn [[NDA]], not the sale of your soul. | ||
For those of you who can’t see your way clear to embracing the [[OneNDA]], and who have not yet been asked to [[get your coat]], here are the basic things it needs to cover: | |||
'''Who is who''': Who is disclosing, who is receiving, or is it mutual? Mutual is good — as it plays to the idea that this is fair, but sometimes you want to just get across the line quickly, by offering confidentiality, without requiring it. That way, for example, you can just sign without seeking ''assent''. <br> | '''Who is who''': Who is disclosing, who is receiving, or is it mutual? Mutual is good — as it plays to the idea that this is fair, but sometimes you want to just get across the line quickly, by offering confidentiality, without requiring it. That way, for example, you can just sign without seeking ''assent''. <br> | ||
'''The {{confiprov|Confidential information}}''': What counts as {{confiprov|confidential information}}, and what doesn’t? <br> | '''The {{confiprov|Confidential information}}''': What counts as {{confiprov|confidential information}}, and what doesn’t? <br> | ||
Revision as of 09:20, 17 September 2021
what’s in an NDA
Let’s be blunt about this: there is a special place in hell for any advisor who serves up a confidentiality agreement more than 3 pages long. Even three pages is purgatorially tedious. GET TO THE POINT. It’s a goddamn NDA, not the sale of your soul.
For those of you who can’t see your way clear to embracing the OneNDA, and who have not yet been asked to get your coat, here are the basic things it needs to cover:
Who is who: Who is disclosing, who is receiving, or is it mutual? Mutual is good — as it plays to the idea that this is fair, but sometimes you want to just get across the line quickly, by offering confidentiality, without requiring it. That way, for example, you can just sign without seeking assent.
The Confidential information: What counts as confidential information, and what doesn’t?
Purpose: Why are you disclosing the confidential information? What is the project?
The confidentiality obligation itself: How is the receiver expected to keep it secret? Who can the receiver share with? On what terms?
Mandatory disclosure beyond the project: What about compulsory disclosure under legal process, statutes and regulations?
Term: How long does the confidentiality obligation last?
Other: Representations and warranties, governing law, And for God’s sake WHATEVER YOU DO DON’T FORGET THE COUNTERPARTS CLAUSE.
What shouldn’t be in an NDA
The following often make their way into a confi agreement, though none really have any business being there.