Close-out Amount - 1992 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|isda|}}Now the dirty secret is that there ''isn’t'' a “Close-out Amount” as such under a {{1992ma}} but, in places, on this wiki we’ll refer to one, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than “the amount determined following early termination of a {{isdaprov|Terminated Transaction}} using {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}} ([[as the case may be]]) and the {{isdaprov|Second Method}}, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the {{isdaprov|First Method}}, under the {{1992ma}}”.
{{a|isda|}}Now the dirty secret is that there ''isn’t'' a “Close-out Amount” as such under a {{1992ma}} but, in places, on this wiki we’ll refer to one, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than “the amount determined following early termination of a {{isda92prov|Terminated Transaction}} using {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} or {{isda92prov|Loss}} ([[as the case may be]]) and the {{isda92prov|Second Method}}, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the {{isda92prov|First Method}}, under the {{1992ma}}”.
 
Close-out Amount is the shorthand term, introduced in the {{2002ma}} for the value you get from terminating Transactions on a, well, close-out. The {{icds}} of the First Men, were less committed to Ellroyesque machine-gun prose than were there Millennial successors, you see.
 
{{Sa}}
*{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}}
*{{isda92prov|Loss}}
*{{isda92prov|Terminated Transaction}}
*The [[First Men]]

Revision as of 18:59, 2 March 2022

ISDA Anatomy™
Index: Click to expand:Navigation
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Now the dirty secret is that there isn’t a “Close-out Amount” as such under a 1992 ISDA but, in places, on this wiki we’ll refer to one, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than “the amount determined following early termination of a Terminated Transaction using Market Quotation or Loss (as the case may be) and the Second Method, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the First Method, under the 1992 ISDA”.

Close-out Amount is the shorthand term, introduced in the 2002 ISDA for the value you get from terminating Transactions on a, well, close-out. The ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ of the First Men, were less committed to Ellroyesque machine-gun prose than were there Millennial successors, you see.

See also