Data modernism: Difference between revisions

Data modernism (view source)

Revision as of 07:21, 3 November 2022

347 bytes added , 3 November 2022

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

83,057

edits

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The belief that sufficiently powerful machines running sufficiently sophisticated [[algorithm]]s over sufficiently massive quantities of unstructured [[data]] can, by themselves, solve the future.}} A prelude to the [[great delamination]].
-There is a strand of [[High modernism|modernist]] thinking that flows from [[The Death and Life of Great American Cities|Robert Moses]], Le Corbusier, that there is an optimisable configuration for human interaction and it can be derived from a rigorously scientific, or at least mathematical, method: that the only obstacle to implementing it has been the lack of a sufficiently powerful machine to run the calculation.
+There is a strand of [[High modernism|high-modernist]]<ref>For more on high-modernism see {{br|The Death and Life of Great American Cities}} and {{br|Seeing Like a State}}</ref> that optimised human interaction can be derived mathematically from data science: that all that has stopped it till now is the want of a sufficiently powerful machine to run the calculations.
-The time is now close at hand, whereby the means is at our disposal. We now have the processing power to take massive amounts of “[[noise]]” and from it extrapolate a [[Signal-to-noise ratio|signal]]. We don’t necessarily understand ''how'' the [[algorithm]]<nowiki/>s extrapolate a signal; they just do — this inscrutability  is part of the appeal of it: there is no “all-too-human” bias<ref>At least, until the algo goes rogue and becomes a Nazi.</ref> — but there is a belief which stretches from paid-up Randian anarcho-capitalists to certified latter-day socialists, that ''we can solve our problems with data''.
+This is a generalisation, but it funds extreme expression in the {{The Singularity is Near|nearby singularity]], the [[simulation hypothesis]] and [[AI]], and in more gentle terms in [[Blockchain]] maximalism, [[alpha Go]].
+The underlying premise: the universe is monstrously complicated, but fundamentally bounded, [[finite]] and probabilistic. It is not [[complex]].
+By this view the time is now close at hand, whereby the means to calculate everything is at our disposal. We now have the processing power to take colossal “[[noise]]” and from it extrapolate a [[Signal-to-noise ratio|signal]]. We don’t necessarily understand ''how'' the machines will do this; just that they will: this [[algorithm|algorithmic]] inscrutability is part of the appeal: there is no “all-too-human” bias<ref>At least, until the algo goes rogue and becomes a Nazi.</ref> — but there is a belief which stretches from paid-up Randian anarcho-capitalists to certified latter-day socialists, that ''we can solve our problems with data''.
 ===Data ''modernism''? Or ''post''-modernism?===