The Atlantis Variation: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{disaster cafe}}{{C|Mythology}}The [[2008 ISDA Master Agreement]], also known as the “[[Atlantis variation]]”, is an apocryphal edition of the {{isdama}}, ''almost'' completed in September 2008. It never saw the light of day, instead collapsing into a form of dark | {{disaster cafe}}{{C|Mythology}}The [[2008 ISDA Master Agreement]], also known (after the [[Hunter Barkley]] novella of the same name) as the “[[Atlantis variation]]”, is an apocryphal edition of the {{isdama}}, ''almost'' completed in September 2008. It never saw the light of day, instead collapsing into a form of dark tedium that powers the universe. | ||
According to Barkley’s dystopian vision, the {{2008ma}} was to be short, plainly worded, future-proofed and agile. It would allowing counterparties to agree trading terms with little fuss and only the cursory clerical management that could be [[legal service delivery|delivered]] through unskilled personnel in low-cost jurisdictions and, eventually, robots. It used [[distributed ledger technology]]. You know, [[blockchain]]. It would be negotiated between banks of dematerialised [[large language model]]<nowiki/>s housed, for the sense of theatre, [[Proverbial school-leaver from Bucharest|in data centres on the outskirts of Bucharest]]. | |||
Had it been implemented, it would have addressed the financial, infrastructural and regulatory challenges which dominated the derivatives trading market in the early 21st century. It would have consolidated documentation across a wide range of products ([[including but not limited to]] [[repo]], [[stock lending]], [[prime brokerage]], [[exchange traded derivatives]], [[commodities]] and [[emissions]]), finally moving the financial world into a stable state: a [[sunlit utopia]] in which all risks are known, all eventualities experienced and contingencies accounted for. | Had it been implemented, it would have addressed the financial, infrastructural and regulatory challenges which dominated the derivatives trading market in the early 21st century. It would have consolidated documentation across a wide range of products ([[including but not limited to]] [[repo]], [[stock lending]], [[prime brokerage]], [[exchange traded derivatives]], [[commodities]] and [[emissions]]), finally moving the financial world into a stable state: a [[sunlit utopia]] in which all risks are known, all eventualities experienced and contingencies accounted for. | ||
''[[Risk]]'' would finally be banished for ever. | ''[[Risk]]'' would finally be banished for ever. | ||
As it was, the challenge was just too big. The project expanded — at first gradually; in the closing stages at breakneck pace — and in the final days exceeded its [[Schwarzschild radius of document comprehension|Schwarzschild radius]] altogether. There was a sudden, catastrophic implosion, and everything associated with the project — all traces of the agreement, drafts, the firm {{ISDA}} engaged to coordinate the drafting ( | As it was, the challenge was just too big. The project expanded — at first gradually; in the closing stages at breakneck pace — and in the final days exceeded its [[Schwarzschild radius of document comprehension|Schwarzschild radius]] altogether. There was a sudden, catastrophic implosion, and everything associated with the project — all traces of the agreement, drafts, the firm {{ISDA}} engaged to coordinate the drafting (a cyber law firm that arose when a document management system in the firm [[Tubb Fuller Breaden Potter Bacon]] became self-aware and eliminated all the carbon-based lawyers)<ref>[[TFBPB]] has never been heard of since, and curiously, no record now exists of this firm before 2008, even though it was apparently a global behemoth.</ref> and several thousand members of ISDA’s document working group, seconded by their employers to contributing their “clarifications” and [[For the avoidance of doubt|doubt-avoidances]] for the greater good of the standard form simply vanished. | ||
All — the document, the personnel, the drafting miscellanea and terabytes of [[Tedium|tedia]] — are now lost to history. We now do not know what the agreement said, how it said it, or indeed whether the agreement really existed at all. And the robots — | All — the document, the personnel, the drafting miscellanea and terabytes of [[Tedium|tedia]] — are now lost to history. We now do not know what the agreement said, how it said it, or indeed whether the agreement really existed at all. And the robots — | ||
Well, speaking of robots, | Well, speaking of robots, Barkley claims that Roy Batty’s extraordinary speech from the original ''Blade Runner'' (1982) fell ''backwards in time'' through a rent in the fabric of the [[space-tedium continuum]] created by the 2008 financial markets implosion, landing in Rutger Hauer’s lap as he was waiting in makeup for that final scene. Hauer, not realising this was a unique document from the apocalyptic future, took it for a script redraft. He adapted it, but only slightly, from the original record, which was exchange between an [[ETD]] [[negotiator]] and a mortally injured {{tag|CDO}} lawyer as he dragged his mutilated psyche away from the smoking ruins of his employer: | ||
“You thought you knew ''everything'', didn’t you,” [[sneered]] the hapless [[futures]] specialist. “And ''now'' look at us. ''You'' did this. You have no idea.” | “You thought you knew ''everything'', didn’t you,” [[sneered]] the hapless [[futures]] specialist. “And ''now'' look at us. ''You'' did this. You have no idea.” | ||
Revision as of 07:52, 19 September 2023
|
Chez Guevara — Dining in style at the Disaster Café™
|
The 2008 ISDA Master Agreement, also known (after the Hunter Barkley novella of the same name) as the “Atlantis variation”, is an apocryphal edition of the ISDA Master Agreement, almost completed in September 2008. It never saw the light of day, instead collapsing into a form of dark tedium that powers the universe.
According to Barkley’s dystopian vision, the 2008 ISDA was to be short, plainly worded, future-proofed and agile. It would allowing counterparties to agree trading terms with little fuss and only the cursory clerical management that could be delivered through unskilled personnel in low-cost jurisdictions and, eventually, robots. It used distributed ledger technology. You know, blockchain. It would be negotiated between banks of dematerialised large language models housed, for the sense of theatre, in data centres on the outskirts of Bucharest.
Had it been implemented, it would have addressed the financial, infrastructural and regulatory challenges which dominated the derivatives trading market in the early 21st century. It would have consolidated documentation across a wide range of products (including but not limited to repo, stock lending, prime brokerage, exchange traded derivatives, commodities and emissions), finally moving the financial world into a stable state: a sunlit utopia in which all risks are known, all eventualities experienced and contingencies accounted for.
Risk would finally be banished for ever.
As it was, the challenge was just too big. The project expanded — at first gradually; in the closing stages at breakneck pace — and in the final days exceeded its Schwarzschild radius altogether. There was a sudden, catastrophic implosion, and everything associated with the project — all traces of the agreement, drafts, the firm ISDA engaged to coordinate the drafting (a cyber law firm that arose when a document management system in the firm Tubb Fuller Breaden Potter Bacon became self-aware and eliminated all the carbon-based lawyers)[1] and several thousand members of ISDA’s document working group, seconded by their employers to contributing their “clarifications” and doubt-avoidances for the greater good of the standard form simply vanished.
All — the document, the personnel, the drafting miscellanea and terabytes of tedia — are now lost to history. We now do not know what the agreement said, how it said it, or indeed whether the agreement really existed at all. And the robots —
Well, speaking of robots, Barkley claims that Roy Batty’s extraordinary speech from the original Blade Runner (1982) fell backwards in time through a rent in the fabric of the space-tedium continuum created by the 2008 financial markets implosion, landing in Rutger Hauer’s lap as he was waiting in makeup for that final scene. Hauer, not realising this was a unique document from the apocalyptic future, took it for a script redraft. He adapted it, but only slightly, from the original record, which was exchange between an ETD negotiator and a mortally injured CDO lawyer as he dragged his mutilated psyche away from the smoking ruins of his employer:
“You thought you knew everything, didn’t you,” sneered the hapless futures specialist. “And now look at us. You did this. You have no idea.”
The CDO man turned, a replicant glimmer in his eye, and said:
- I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe.
- Attack-ships on fire off the red-herring of Orion 2006-1 hybrid CDO.
- I watched mezzanine-tranches glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate.
- All those moments will be lost in time, like payments in kind.
- Time to retrain —
- As a primary-school teacher.