Hedging Disruption - Equity Derivatives Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 16:24, 6 April 2017 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Equity Derivatives Anatomy™


12.9(a)(v)Hedging Disruption” means that the Hedging Party is unable, after using commercially reasonable efforts, to (A) acquire, establish, re-establish, substitute, maintain, unwind or dispose of any transaction(s) or asset(s) it deems necessary to hedge the equity price risk of entering into and performing its obligations with respect to the relevant Transaction, or (B) realize, recover or remit the proceeds of any such transaction(s) or asset(s);

(view template)


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Pernickety amendments

Expect to see some amendments to this clause, chiefly to appease fastidious counsel. For example:

  • You may see some tinkering with “transaction(s) or asset(s) it deems necessary to hedge the equity price risk of entering into and performing its obligations with respect to the relevant Transaction” — perhaps to refer to “Hedge Positions” instead of “transaction(s) or asset(s)”[1], and to broaden equity price risk to “market risk (including but not limited to equity price risk, foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk)”
  • Some counsel may wish to add to limb (B) “convert into the Settlement Currency” and upgrade “remit the proceeds of and/or collateral posted with respect to any such Hedge Positions”, just in case it might be thought that collateral didn’t count as proceeds of a hedge.
  • The Hedging Party may only be allowed to terminate any transaction pro rata with the actual Hedging Disruption


Template:Triplecocktail

See also


Consequences of Hedging Disruption

Consequences of an Additional Disruption Event in particular 12.9(b)(iii) and, where Loss of Stock Borrow intersects with Hedging Disruption, 12.9(b)(vii):

Template:Eqderivsnap Template:Eqderivsnap Template:Eqderivanatomy

  1. It is always sad to see an ISDA drafting committee pass up the opportunity to use and/or, by the way.