Template:Calculation agent dispute

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 11:53, 13 April 2017 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===Should you include a dispute right for determinations made by the calculation agent?=== Recognising that “should you?”, and “will you have to”, are different questi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Should you include a dispute right for determinations made by the calculation agent?

Recognising that “should you?”, and “will you have to”, are different questions, here is how it rolls.

Client’s lawyer: we must have a dispute right so help me.

  • The Dealer will be the Calculation Agent. (True.)
  • The Dealer will be the Hedging Party. (True.)
  • The Dealer will be the Determining Party. (True.)
  • Dealers are bad, venal people. They have blackened hearts and will stop at nothing to rip their clients’ faces off. We need some check on their unfettered and sure-to-be outrageously exercised discretion. (A matter of debate, but if that’s your starting point your foundational premise is why are you doing business with this vassal in the first place?)
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Calculation_agent_dispute&oldid=16690"