Black duck: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
Subtle, but important intellectual distinction even though it has no practical influence on the lived experience of (a) taxpayers or (b) [[subject matter expert]]s.
Subtle, but important intellectual distinction even though it has no practical influence on the lived experience of (a) taxpayers or (b) [[subject matter expert]]s.


So, black swans: The collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11, the internet, [[GameStop]].
So, black swans: The collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11, the internet, [[GameStop]], [[Credit Suisse]] (if you are UBS).


''Not'' black swans: [[Covid-19]], the [[Global Financial Crisis]], the Invasion of Ukraine, Archegos, [[Cryptocurrency]] fraud, [[SVB|SVB Memeplex]].
Black ducks: [[Covid-19]], the [[Global Financial Crisis]], the Invasion of Ukraine, Archegos, [[Cryptocurrency]] fraud, [[SVB|SVB Memeplex]], [[Credit Suisse]] (if you are [[Credit Suisse]]).


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Black swan]]
*[[Black swan]]

Revision as of 14:47, 4 April 2023

Black Duck.png
In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Black duck
/blæk/ /dʌk/ (n.)

An event that:

(a) Has an outsized, or non-linear impact on its environment
(b) Is highly amenable to ex post facto, wise-after-the-event rationalisations, especially by politicians, regulators and bank executives
(c) Lies outside the actual expectations, whether or not sensible or reasonable, of the person whose job it is — was — to keep an eye out for things of this nature.

From a bank executive’s perspective, black ducks are like black swansexactly the same, in fact — only easier for people on Twitter to be judgmental about. The key, for such a bank executive, is to position yourself so you can be judgmental about them on Twitter, too. That means finding someone else to blame. Bank executives have proven very adept at this over the years.

So, if it is a black swan, Q.E.D. it is no-one’s fault, certainly not yours, being impossible to foresee,[1] so you get away scot-free, the taxpayer foots the bill and you just fire a few subject matter experts for the sake of good order and to be seen to be doing something.

If it is a black duck, you should have known better, so your main industry is plausibly establishing that this is all your subject matter expert’s fault, so you fire them for good measure and the taxpayer picks up the bill.

Subtle, but important intellectual distinction even though it has no practical influence on the lived experience of (a) taxpayers or (b) subject matter experts.

So, black swans: The collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11, the internet, GameStop, Credit Suisse (if you are UBS).

Black ducks: Covid-19, the Global Financial Crisis, the Invasion of Ukraine, Archegos, Cryptocurrency fraud, SVB Memeplex, Credit Suisse (if you are Credit Suisse).

See also

  1. Being “impossible to foresee” is quite closely correlated with Nassim Nicholas Taleb not being able to foresee it.