Critical theory: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{a|devil|}} *AI and why your job is safe *Evolution")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}
{{def|Theory|/ˈθɪəri/|n|}}
*[[AI]] and why your job is safe
(''Sociology'') A Catch-all phrase designed to pin down an intellectual movement which, above all other priorities, as a horror of being ''pinned down'', since what can be pinned down can be analysed and exposed. [[Theory]], in this context, is “third-wave” post modernism: Critical theory (originally race, law and gender but now has forked into whatever happens to be the ''cause célébre'' du jour); social justice theory; wokeness; general [[snowflake]]ry. To be clear: the [[JC]] lines up with the [[libtard]]s here: a pluralistic, tolerant society that is maximally permissive of the non-aggressive interests of marginalised and which, all other things being equal, defends those interests in cases of conflict with a majority is an optimal one. But this isn’t to say there aren’t thoroughly unscrupulous people doing thoroughly unscrupulous things in the name of social justice.
*[[Evolution]]
 
{{sa}}
*{{br|Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race Gender and Identity}}
*{{br|The Madness of Crowds}}

Revision as of 00:41, 13 December 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Dictionary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Dictionary.jpg

Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Theory /ˈθɪəri/ (n.)
(Sociology) A Catch-all phrase designed to pin down an intellectual movement which, above all other priorities, as a horror of being pinned down, since what can be pinned down can be analysed and exposed. Theory, in this context, is “third-wave” post modernism: Critical theory (originally race, law and gender but now has forked into whatever happens to be the cause célébre du jour); social justice theory; wokeness; general snowflakery. To be clear: the JC lines up with the libtards here: a pluralistic, tolerant society that is maximally permissive of the non-aggressive interests of marginalised and which, all other things being equal, defends those interests in cases of conflict with a majority is an optimal one. But this isn’t to say there aren’t thoroughly unscrupulous people doing thoroughly unscrupulous things in the name of social justice.

See also