Effect: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Ibanez-ts808-vintage-tube-screamer.jpg|thumb|right|The original TS-808 - everything you need for that fat, creamy, crying tone.]] | [[File:Ibanez-ts808-vintage-tube-screamer.jpg|thumb|right|The original TS-808 - everything you need for that fat, creamy, crying tone.]] | ||
An [[effect]] is, ''always'', a [[noun]]. One may speak of the '''rainbow effect''', '''special effects''' or, if one is a fan of the [[electric guitar]], an '''effects pedal''' like Ibanez’s '''{{google|tube-screamer}}'' or Jim Dunlop’s {{google|Cry-Baby Wah-wah}}. Put those two puppies together: now ''that’s'' an effect. | An [[effect]] is, ''always'', a [[noun]]. One may speak of the '''rainbow effect''', '''special effects''' or, if one is a fan of the [[electric guitar]], an '''effects pedal''' like Ibanez’s '''{{google|tube-screamer}}'' or Jim Dunlop’s {{google|Cry-Baby Wah-wah}}. | ||
Put those two puppies together: now ''that’s'' an effect. | |||
But one must ''not'' use [[effect]] as a {{tag|verb}}, even as a space-filler, however clamorously your inner [[Mediocre lawyer|articled clerk]] implores you to. “Effect” is the weakest {{tag|verb}} in the English language. Whatever you are intending to “[[effect]]” is almost certain to be a [[nominalisation]] of a stronger, better [[verb]]; one better suited to the task you have in mind. | But one must ''not'' use [[effect]] as a {{tag|verb}}, even as a space-filler, however clamorously your inner [[Mediocre lawyer|articled clerk]] implores you to. “Effect” is the weakest {{tag|verb}} in the English language. Whatever you are intending to “[[effect]]” is almost certain to be a [[nominalisation]] of a stronger, better [[verb]]; one better suited to the task you have in mind. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
{{plain|effect the conversion of shares|convert the shares}} | {{plain|effect the conversion of shares|convert the shares}} | ||
{{plain|effect the delivey of a notice|deliver a notice}} | {{plain|effect the delivey of a notice|deliver a notice}} | ||
Why say “effect the butchery of a perfectly good sentence” when you mean - | |||
Well, you get the point. | |||
{{plainenglish}} | {{plainenglish}} | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 5 June 2017
An effect is, always, a noun. One may speak of the rainbow effect', special effects or, if one is a fan of the electric guitar, an effects pedal like Ibanez’s Let me Google that for you or Jim Dunlop’s Wah-wah Let me Google that for you.
Put those two puppies together: now that’s an effect.
But one must not use effect as a verb, even as a space-filler, however clamorously your inner articled clerk implores you to. “Effect” is the weakest verb in the English language. Whatever you are intending to “effect” is almost certain to be a nominalisation of a stronger, better verb; one better suited to the task you have in mind.
Why say “effect the conversion of shares” when you mean “convert the shares”?
Why say “effect the delivey of a notice” when you mean “deliver a notice”?
Why say “effect the butchery of a perfectly good sentence” when you mean -
Well, you get the point.
Plain English Anatomy™ Noun | Verb | Adjective | Adverb | Preposition | Conjunction | Latin | Germany | Flannel | Legal triplicate | Nominalisation | Murder your darlings