Events of Default (Early Termination Payments) - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|6(e)(i)}}
{{isdaanat|6(e)(i)}}
The effect of this is that in closing out an ISDA, the first step is to terminate all {{isdaprov|transaction}}s, then figure out any {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s that were due but had not been paid at the time the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} terminated. The close out happens under Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} of the {{isdama}} itself and the recourse is to a net sum. Betting does ''not'' happen under the {{isdaprov|Transactions}} — on the theory of the game there are no outstanding Transactions at the point of netting; just payables.  
The effect of this is that in closing out an ISDA, the first step is to terminate all {{isdaprov|transaction}}s to arrive at a {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} for each one, then figure out if there were any {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s that were due under {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s but had not been paid at the time the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s terminated. The close out happens under Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} of the {{isdama}} itself and the recourse is to a net sum. Netting does ''not'' happen under the {{isdaprov|Transactions}} — on the theory of the game there are no outstanding Transactions at the point of netting; just payables.  


Therefore, if your [[credit support]] (particularly [[guarantee]]s or [[LC|letters of credit]]) explicitly reference amounts due under specific {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s, you may lose any credit support at precisely the point you need it.  
Therefore, if your [[credit support]] (particularly [[guarantee]]s or [[LC|letters of credit]]) explicitly reference amounts due under specific {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s, you may lose any credit support at precisely the point you need it.  

Revision as of 15:08, 15 October 2018

ISDA Anatomy™
incorporating our exclusive ISDA in a Nutshell™


In a Nutshell Section 6(e)(i):

6(e)(i) Events of Default. On an Early Termination Date following an Event of Default, the Non-defaulting Party will determine Early Termination Amount in the Termination Currency as the sum of:
(a) the Close-out Amounts for each Terminated Transaction plus
(b) Unpaid Amounts due to the Non-defaulting Party; minus
(c) Unpaid Amounts due to the Defaulting Party.
If the Early Termination Amount is positive, the Defaulting Party will pay it to the Non-defaulting Party. If negative, the Non-defaulting Party will pay its absolute value to the Defaulting Party.

view template

2002 ISDA full text of Section 6(e)(i):

6(e)(i) Events of Default. If the Early Termination Date results from an Event of Default, the Early Termination Amount will be an amount equal to (1) the sum of (A) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Close-out Amount or Close-out Amounts (whether positive or negative) determined by the Non-defaulting Party for each Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions, as the case may be, and (B) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Non-defaulting Party less (2) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Defaulting Party. If the Early Termination Amount is a positive number, the Defaulting Party will pay it to the Non-defaulting Party; if it is a negative number, the Non-defaulting Party will pay the absolute value of the Early Termination Amount to the Defaulting Party.

view template

Click here for the text of Section 6(e)(i) in the 1992 ISDA


Index: Click to expand:Navigation
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

Early Termination 6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations

6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsSet-off

6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsSet-off

Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


The effect of this is that in closing out an ISDA, the first step is to terminate all transactions to arrive at a Close-out Amount for each one, then figure out if there were any Unpaid Amounts that were due under Transactions but had not been paid at the time the Transactions terminated. The close out happens under Section 6(e) of the ISDA Master Agreement itself and the recourse is to a net sum. Netting does not happen under the Transactions — on the theory of the game there are no outstanding Transactions at the point of netting; just payables.

Therefore, if your credit support (particularly guarantees or letters of credit) explicitly reference amounts due under specific Transactions, you may lose any credit support at precisely the point you need it.

Which would be a bummer.

Further commentary on the Guarantee page.

See also