Great dogma of contract negotiation

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 20:22, 10 June 2019 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|negotiation|}}Once upon a time an {{isdama}} was a new and dangerous thing, and one would drop twenty or thirty grand with the finest finance lawyer money coul...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Negotiation Anatomy™


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Once upon a time an ISDA Master Agreement was a new and dangerous thing, and one would drop twenty or thirty grand with the finest finance lawyer money could by to make sure one’s goolies were safe. It was a wonderful period of discovery for we young associates, trying to figure out what on earth Automatic Early Termination even meant, but charging some finance director £350 an hour while we found out.


Before long, ISDA Master Agreements were common, and their negotiation within financial service firms had been quite the cottage industry. Any good-sized institution will have literally hundreds of people devoted to producing these beasts: in onboarding, AML, credit sanctioning, netting and negiotiating ISDA Master Agreements and like-minded master trading agreements.

Management consultants and COOs are good at spotting large aggregated costs in an organisation and the contract negotiation process sticks out like a butcher at a chickpea curry stall. There is not an investment bank in town who hasn’t taken a chainsaw to its document negotiation operation — most many times over the last 15 years — and yet contract negotiation remains one of the massive sinkholes in modern finance. The process gets more bogged down, more frustrating, and more expensive.

Ask me why. Go on, ask me why.

And all because the management consultants don’t observe basic principles of their own discipline.