Or any part thereof: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|plainenglish|[[File:Or any part thereof.png|thumb|510px|right|Stick ''that'' in your pipe and smoke it, [[Counselor]]]]}}{{f|Or any part thereof}} is a piece of {{tag|flannel}} perfect for wiping clean the face of just the kind of cherub who would never get his little [[boat-race]] grubby in the first place. You know the kind: butter wouldn’t melt in his jumped-up little gob.
{{a|banned|{{image|Or any part thereof|png|Stick ''that'' in your pipe and smoke it, [[Counselor]]}}}}As pathologically as they abhor elegance, [[legal eagle]]s deplore a [[vacuum]], and if you’re the sort who believes that a sum does not include each of its parts taken individually, the work-a-day expression “{{f|Or any part thereof}}” is perfect for the pregnant pause you might otherwise have in your draft.


When it comes to face-washing, you may need a {{tag|flannel}}, but to state it baldly and without qualification omits the undeniable fact you may not need ''the whole thing''.  
It is also a satisfying way of “improving” the drafting of a those who themselves aggravate the [[negotiation]] process with leaden augmentations. We all know one<ref>Dammit we all know THOUSANDS.</ref>.  


Now, as pathologically as they abhor elegance, [[legal eagle]]s deplore a [[vacuum]], and if you’re the sort who believes that a sum does not include each of its parts taken individually, this work-a-day expression is perfect for the pregnant pause you might otherwise have in your draft.
However pedantic your adversary may be, in a long document he will be ''bound'' to have missed a clarifying construction somewhere. It will be a cinch to find it. And then, “, [[or any part thereof]]” — scrawled on a [[rider]], ideally, for dramatic effect — is your slam dunk; your dead fish shot in a barrel. You’ve got him.


It is also a satisfying way of “improving” the drafting of the sort of pernickety [[counselor]] who has been aggravating a [[negotiation]] process with leaden augmentations. We all know one<ref>Dammit we all know THOUSANDS.</ref>. However pedantic your adversary may be, in a long document he will be bound to have missed a simple construction somewhere. It is a cinch to find it. And then, here is your slam dunk, your dead fish shot in a barrel — with this harmless unguent, you can at last have one over this cretinous fellow, appending it in the privacy of your own chambers with the lawyer’s flourish that, in other fields of endeavour, invites the expression “[[in your face|IN YOUR ''FACE'']]”, prompts a footballer’s [[Swept-back wing knee-slide|swept-back wing fighter-jet impersonation]] or [[Knee-slide and jet wings|knee-slide to the corner flag]], enables a baseballer’s serial high-five as he ambles past the dug-out, or a wide receiver’s flamboyant pimp-roll round the end-zone as he awaits his team mates’ acclamation.
With this harmless, but spiteful, unguent, appended in the privacy of your own chambers with a lawyer’s flourish you can perform same pimp-roll that prompts a goal-scoring footballer’s [[Swept-back wing knee-slide|swept-back wing fighter-jet impersonation]] to the corner flag or a baseballer’s serial high-five as she ambles past the dug-out.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Negotiation]]
*[[Negotiation]]
*{{t|Profound ontological uncertainty}}
*[[Rider]]
 
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 09:09, 17 December 2022

The JC’s Unmentionables™

Expressions our subeditor would strike from your copy — if we had a subeditor, and you submitted copy.
Or any part thereof.png
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, Counselor
🚫🚫🚫
Index: Click ᐅ to expand:
Banned
Flannel
Drafting

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

As pathologically as they abhor elegance, legal eagles deplore a vacuum, and if you’re the sort who believes that a sum does not include each of its parts taken individually, the work-a-day expression “Or any part thereof” is perfect for the pregnant pause you might otherwise have in your draft.

It is also a satisfying way of “improving” the drafting of a those who themselves aggravate the negotiation process with leaden augmentations. We all know one[1].

However pedantic your adversary may be, in a long document he will be bound to have missed a clarifying construction somewhere. It will be a cinch to find it. And then, “, or any part thereof” — scrawled on a rider, ideally, for dramatic effect — is your slam dunk; your dead fish shot in a barrel. You’ve got him.

With this harmless, but spiteful, unguent, appended in the privacy of your own chambers with a lawyer’s flourish you can perform same pimp-roll that prompts a goal-scoring footballer’s swept-back wing fighter-jet impersonation to the corner flag or a baseballer’s serial high-five as she ambles past the dug-out.

See also

References

  1. ↑ Dammit we all know THOUSANDS.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Or_any_part_thereof&oldid=70114"