Ninth law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Briefly stated, however anal it may be to add qualifications, clarifications, [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, [[without limitation]]s and other forensic {{f|celery}}, once these “correctives” have been made it is even ''more'' anal to try to remove them again, seeing as, [[Q.E.D.]], they make no difference to the legal or economic substance of the agreement either way. So, inevitably, one won’t [[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it|die in a ditch about it]], however appealing by comparison that experience might, to a [[prose stylist]], seem, and the agreement will silt up to the point where its original intent is hard or impossible to make out.  
Briefly stated, however anal it may be to add qualifications, clarifications, [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, [[without limitation]]s and other forensic {{f|celery}}, once these “correctives” have been made it is even ''more'' anal to try to remove them again, seeing as, [[Q.E.D.]], they make no difference to the legal or economic substance of the agreement either way. So, inevitably, one won’t [[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it|die in a ditch about it]], however appealing by comparison that experience might, to a [[prose stylist]], seem, and the agreement will silt up to the point where its original intent is hard or impossible to make out.  


Hiring a dredger is expensive, and since the operating assumption of all [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] is that no-one ever got sued for writing an unintelligible agreement<ref>“What the eye don't understand, the chef gets away with”.</ref>, so you leave it until one day your contract nears the [[event horizon]] of intelligibility, beyond which it risks collapsing in on itself and precipitating the [[boredom heat death]] of the universe.
Hiring a dredger is expensive, and since the operating assumption of all [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] is that no-one ever got sued for writing an unintelligible agreement<ref>“What the eye don't understand, the chef gets away with”.</ref>, you leave it (perhaps tossing in a [[disclaimer]] for good measure) until one day your contract nears the [[event horizon]] of intelligibility, beyond which it risks collapsing in on itself, taking you with it, and precipitating the [[boredom heat death]] of the universe.
 
It almost happened in [[2008 ISDA Master Agreement|2008]], so don’t joke about it.
{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Schwarzschild radius]]
*[[Schwarzschild radius]]

Navigation menu