82,459
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A kind of profound ontological uncertainty which leads to proliferating inclusos and for the avoidance of doubts, is the lawyer's reluctance to...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
“How was it articulated, Mr. [[Amwell J|Amwell]]? Speak up, I can’t hear you.” <br> | “How was it articulated, Mr. [[Amwell J|Amwell]]? Speak up, I can’t hear you.” <br> | ||
“It was in words, your honour.” <br> | “It was in words, your honour.” <br> | ||
“Words?” < | “Words?” <br> | ||
“Yes. Words.” <br> | “Yes. Words.” <br> | ||
“And are you suggesting that words spelling out a message, contained in a purely electronic medium, these are somehow not writing?” <br> | “And are you suggesting that words spelling out a message, contained in a purely electronic medium, these are somehow not writing?” <br> |