82,460
edits
I never said you couldn’t: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A deep [[profound ontological uncertainty|self-doubt]] which begets [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]’s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have say what you have '''not''' agreed to do in a [[contract]]''. You don’t have to do ''anything'' you haven’t agreed to do. | A deep [[profound ontological uncertainty|self-doubt]] which begets [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]’s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have say what you have '''not''' agreed to do in a [[contract]]''. You don’t have to do ''anything'' you haven’t agreed to do. | ||
Your starting point, therefore, should be that you should not say what you are not going to do. The trick comes with trying to peg back a vague, general commitment, by using specific restrictions ([[for the avoidance of doubt]]. Of course, the literary-minded might prefer to draft clearly and precisely in the first place. | Your starting point, therefore, should be that you should ''not'' say what you are not going to do. Because that perversely, might be taken as implying you ''have'' agreed to do something else you forgot to rule out. | ||
The trick comes with trying to peg back a vague, general commitment, by using specific restrictions ([[for the avoidance of doubt]]). Of course, the literary-minded might prefer to draft clearly and precisely in the first place. | |||
Which brings us to ''Nasty''. {{video nasty}} | Which brings us to ''Nasty''. {{video nasty}} | ||