82,469
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A | A deep [[profound ontological uncertainty|self-doubt]] which begets [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]’s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have say what you have '''not''' agreed to do in a [[contract]]''. You don’t have to do ''anything'' you haven’t agreed to do. | ||
Your starting point, therefore, should be that you should not say what you are not going to do. The trick comes with trying to peg back a vague, general commitment, by using specific restrictions ([[for the avoidance of doubt]]. Of course, the literary-minded might prefer to draft clearly and precisely in the first place. | Your starting point, therefore, should be that you should not say what you are not going to do. The trick comes with trying to peg back a vague, general commitment, by using specific restrictions ([[for the avoidance of doubt]]. Of course, the literary-minded might prefer to draft clearly and precisely in the first place. |