Why your job is safe: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago]]
{{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago]]
[[File:Cricket prediction 2.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]]
[[File:Cricket prediction 2.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]]
}}An occasional running series.
}}An occasional running series intended to pose the question: when will Adam Curtis’ assertion that the vaunted predictive power of big data is a “modern ghost story”.


Your job is safe as long as:
Your job is safe as long as:
Line 8: Line 8:
*Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business”.
*Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business”.
*Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”.
*Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”.
*Those splendid data-wizard brianboxes at Goldman Sachs can get their predictions this wrong:
[[File:Goldman football predicition.png|300px|thumb|left|Predicted this:]]
[[File:Actual football outcome.png|300px|thumb|left|Got this:]]
*Long term, [[technology is a leveller]] and not a provider of competitive advantage
*Long term, [[technology is a leveller]] and not a provider of competitive advantage
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Artificial intelligence]]
*[[Artificial intelligence]]

Navigation menu