Template:Triplecocktail regulator action

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 09:18, 15 March 2019 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===Regulator informal action=== Does a regulator’s direction to ditch a hedge mean a {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} is “unable to Commercially reasonable|commercially...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Regulator informal action

Does a regulator’s direction to ditch a hedge mean a Hedging Party is “unable to commercially reasonably maintain” its hedge?

As long as there is no regulatory-approved alternative means of hedging (you know, futures, for example), then the JC says yes. The aspiration to maintain good relations with a body having power to regulate your operations, let alone a plausible apprehension of sanction (be it a monetary penalty, adverse publicity or the regulator barring you from operating in its market or just taking a dim view of your outfit) — provided it is sincere — is a reasonable commercial consideration which would prevent you from maintaining that hedge.