This time it’s different: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 10: Line 10:
Stiffen your sinews if you hear this one.  
Stiffen your sinews if you hear this one.  


So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely it maps to people who believe in a [[determinism|determinist]], [[algorithm]]ic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will ''not'' be different.
So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely they map to the [[reductionist]]s, who believe in a [[determinism|determinist]], [[algorithm]]ic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will ''not'' be different.


All the [[data]] piling up, pointing determinedly backward as it does, viewing the the unfolding universe in its rear-view mirror as the great agglomeration of instantly stale information we collect about everything that has already happened necessarily is, including as it does every fuck-up, ''surely'' should tell you, if it tells you ''anything'' at all, that ''there will be fuck-ups''.  
All the [[data]] piling up, pointing determinedly backward as it does, viewing the the unfolding universe in its rear-view mirror as the [[great agglomeration]] of instantly stale information we collect about everything that has already happened that it necessarily is, including as it does ''every'' fuck-up, even though unanticipated fuck-ups outweigh predictable successes 1,000:1, ''surely'' should tell you, if it tells you ''anything'' at all, that ''there will be fuck-ups''.  


People will be disappointed. People ''will lose money'', in distressingly predictable ways. The universe will ''not'' be suddenly better disposed to the same wilful, wistful, misty-eyed optimism that it has hitherto crushed. For, however measly, niggardly and useless our data is, however infinitesimally tiny a subset it is of ''all possible data, in all times, all places and all dimensions , anywhere in the total space-time of our multi-hued universe, the ''one thing'' it tells us, the single inference we can, with sparkling clarity, draw is that there will be fuck-ups''.  
People will be disappointed. People ''will lose money'', in unpredictable and  predictable ways. The universe will ''not'' be suddenly better disposed to the same wilful, wistful, wishful, misty-eyed optimism that it has hitherto ''crushed like a bug'' at every opportunity.  


So isn’t it the richest of dyspeptic ironies that these millenarian, futurologist, reductionist thought-leaders, data pioneers all, somehow manage to extrapolate from this catalogue of resounding woe, that the forward plan for this new fangled-idea is ''different ''.
For, however measly, paltry and useless the data have collected is, however infinitesimally ''tiny'' a subset it is of all possible data, in all times, at all places and through all dimensions, anywhere in the total space-time of our multi-hued universe, the ''one thing'' it tells us, the single inference we can, with sparkling clarity, draw is that ''there will be fuck-ups''.
 
So isn’t it the richest of dyspeptic ironies that these millenarian, futurologist, [[reductionist]] thought-leaders, data pioneers all, somehow manage to extrapolate from this catalogue of resounding woe, that the forward plan for this new fangled-idea is ''different ''.


No?
No?

Revision as of 23:09, 11 November 2022

Hedgeye nails it.[1]


In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
The Devil’s Advocate

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

With every single technological advance, from the invention of writing to the invention of television, those who have failed to appreciate the non-zero-sum nature of technological evolution have prophesied doom and been proven wrong. Every time, they have made some version of the argument: this time it is different, and been proven wrong.

—Venkatesh Rao, Breaking Smart: Season One

What’s truly amazing about these times is that we have more access than ever before to material that demonstrates the continuity and repetitiveness of history, including evidence of the insistence by critics of all eras that this time is different, yet so many still buy into the pyramid scheme that we are special. It is both self-aggrandising and self-exonerating; it feels right.

—Lauren Oyler, London Review of Books


Stiffen your sinews if you hear this one.

So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely they map to the reductionists, who believe in a determinist, algorithmic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will not be different.

All the data piling up, pointing determinedly backward as it does, viewing the the unfolding universe in its rear-view mirror as the great agglomeration of instantly stale information we collect about everything that has already happened that it necessarily is, including as it does every fuck-up, even though unanticipated fuck-ups outweigh predictable successes 1,000:1, surely should tell you, if it tells you anything at all, that there will be fuck-ups.

People will be disappointed. People will lose money, in unpredictable and predictable ways. The universe will not be suddenly better disposed to the same wilful, wistful, wishful, misty-eyed optimism that it has hitherto crushed like a bug at every opportunity.

For, however measly, paltry and useless the data have collected is, however infinitesimally tiny a subset it is of all possible data, in all times, at all places and through all dimensions, anywhere in the total space-time of our multi-hued universe, the one thing it tells us, the single inference we can, with sparkling clarity, draw is that there will be fuck-ups.

So isn’t it the richest of dyspeptic ironies that these millenarian, futurologist, reductionist thought-leaders, data pioneers all, somehow manage to extrapolate from this catalogue of resounding woe, that the forward plan for this new fangled-idea is different .

No?

A laundry list of times everyone agreed it was different, but it wasn’t:

  • We have eliminated boom and bust. — © Gordon Brown, April 2000.
  • It’s the end of history. We libtards have won. — © Francis Fukuyama, 1992
  • How you value businesses without reference to cashflow or profitability. — © every investment banker ever, in the run-up to the dotcom bust in 2000
  • We have efficiently allocated risk to those best placed to bear it through credit derivatives. — © every investment banker ever, in the run-up to the global financial crisis, 2004-8
  • Mark-to-market accounting of future income streams in a market that doesn’t exist yet is sensible. — © Arthur Andersen[2] Jeff Skilling and the crazy gang at Enron, continually up to October 2001
  • The Singularity is definitely going to happen, and the universe will wake up, rewriting the laws of physics as we know them etc. — © Ray Kurzweil, 2005.
  • Software is eating the world. — © Marc Andreessen, 2009
  • The machines are going to take over, breed us in slimy pods as battery fuel for Skynet which the machines will need because um they just will. Look! Chess-playing supercomputers! — © Daniel Susskind, A World Without Work
  • Everyone is going to be nice to each other now Generation Z is in control and we have taken out and shot all the old white men. — © Every millennial, and millennial apologist ever, 2018 -.
  • Millennial investors have changed the rules of finance forever because bitcoin, memestocks, NFTs, Reddit and so on. — Every hot take ever on Twitter, 2021.

See also

References

  1. ↑ more Hedgeye here
  2. ↑ Who? Ed.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=This_time_it’s_different&oldid=69165"