Repurchase transaction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat|isda|repurchase transaction|netting}} | {{fullanat|isda|repurchase transaction|netting}} | ||
Interestingly, a repo is one of the qualifying [[ISDA transaction types]] and could be effected under an {{isdama}} and would qualify as a legitimate netting transaction, even though, of course one normally effects repo transactions under a {{gmra}}. | Interestingly, a repo is one of the qualifying [[ISDA transaction types]] and could be effected under an {{isdama}} and would qualify as a legitimate netting transaction, even though, of course one normally effects repo transactions under a {{gmra}}. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Transaction - GMRA Provision]] | |||
*[[GMRA anatomy]] | |||
{{ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
Interestingly, a repo is one of the qualifying ISDA transaction types and could be effected under an ISDA Master Agreement and would qualify as a legitimate netting transaction, even though, of course one normally effects repo transactions under a Global Master Repurchase Agreement.
See also
References
- ↑ We assume, for this purpose that under the repurchase transaction, the original seller’s right to repurchase securities is limited to fungible securities and that it has no right to repurchase the exact same securities that it originally sold. This assumption is consistent with market practice, as far as we are aware, in relation to securities repurchase transactions governed by English law, and is necessary to avoid a risk that the transaction might otherwise be characterised by an English court as a secured loan. [Footnote is ISDA’s]