Digital commons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil| | {{a|devil| | ||
{{Image|Dandelion girl|jpg|A young avatar playing on the digital commons yesterday.}} | |||
}}The central irony of the [[digital commons]]: since the practical means of separating of [[information]] from its [[substrate]] became available to all<ref>The [[JC]] dates this to the widespread introduction of [[email]], but the fabulous {{author|James Burke}} makes a good argument that it started 200 is years ago with the [[Jacquard loom]].</ref> ''any'' digital artefact — any [[Code is Law|code]] — can be instantly ''and costlessly'' replicated. No consumables, no materials,<ref>Barring a trivial amount of electricity and no I am not including [[Blockchain]] in that sweeping generalisation.</ref> no labour, no storage, no transport cost.Thus: ''problem | }}The central irony of the [[digital commons]]: since the practical means of separating of [[information]] from its [[substrate]] became available to all,<ref>The [[JC]] dates this to the widespread introduction of [[email]], but the fabulous {{author|James Burke}} makes a good argument that it started 200 is years ago with the [[Jacquard loom]].</ref> ''any'' digital artefact — any [[Code is Law|code]] — can be instantly ''and costlessly'' replicated. No consumables, no materials,<ref>Barring a trivial amount of electricity and no I am not including [[Blockchain]] in that sweeping generalisation.</ref> no labour, no storage, no transport cost. Thus: ''problem'': unless someone trying to make money out of the materials she finds lying around on that common can [[Rent|extract ''rent'']] somehow, her profit margins will quickly tend to zero — if they don’t ''start'' there — as the code she wishes to use in her product, and being its sole value, is freely reproducible to anyone else who cares to bend down and pick it up. | ||
Hence, to make money out of the fruits of one’s past digital labours, ''one must seek rent''. Two ways of doing that are by: | Hence, to make money out of the fruits of one’s past digital labours, ''one must seek rent''. | ||
*exploiting [[copyright|antediluvian legal constructs designed to protect intellectual property rights]], though these | |||
Two ways of doing that are by: | |||
*exploiting [[copyright|antediluvian legal constructs designed to protect intellectual property rights]], though these haven’t fared awfully well on the whole, | |||
or | or | ||
* | *creating a practical, and defendable, monopoly. Happily, distributed digital networks lend themselves very nicely to that. Indeed, the fact that the greatest distributed digital network of them all, the internet, ''isn’t'' a monopoly is an irony almost too great to bear. | ||
The honour roll of companies who have made a fortune from the internet coincides exactly with those who have built a defendable monopoly. | The honour roll of companies who have made a fortune from the internet coincides exactly with those who have built a defendable monopoly. | ||
Extracting rent is the “[[Rolling Stones]]” paradigm: Spend fifteen minutes, asleep, writing a guitar riff and monetising it for sixty years. | Extracting rent is the “[[Rolling Stones]]” paradigm: Spend [[Satisfaction|fifteen minutes, asleep, writing a guitar riff and monetising it for sixty years]]. | ||
But there is another way, and it is the modern way of making money in the internet age: ''play live''. Be paid upfront for your unique experience and expertise, each time, to create new products which, once completed, are free for your client to use. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Tragedy of the commons]] | |||
*[[Before the internet]] | |||
*[[OneNDA]] | |||
*[[End-to-end principle]] | *[[End-to-end principle]] | ||
{{Ref}} | {{Ref}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 13 September 2022
|
|
The central irony of the digital commons: since the practical means of separating of information from its substrate became available to all,[1] any digital artefact — any code — can be instantly and costlessly replicated. No consumables, no materials,[2] no labour, no storage, no transport cost. Thus: problem: unless someone trying to make money out of the materials she finds lying around on that common can extract rent somehow, her profit margins will quickly tend to zero — if they don’t start there — as the code she wishes to use in her product, and being its sole value, is freely reproducible to anyone else who cares to bend down and pick it up.
Hence, to make money out of the fruits of one’s past digital labours, one must seek rent.
Two ways of doing that are by:
- exploiting antediluvian legal constructs designed to protect intellectual property rights, though these haven’t fared awfully well on the whole,
or
- creating a practical, and defendable, monopoly. Happily, distributed digital networks lend themselves very nicely to that. Indeed, the fact that the greatest distributed digital network of them all, the internet, isn’t a monopoly is an irony almost too great to bear.
The honour roll of companies who have made a fortune from the internet coincides exactly with those who have built a defendable monopoly.
Extracting rent is the “Rolling Stones” paradigm: Spend fifteen minutes, asleep, writing a guitar riff and monetising it for sixty years.
But there is another way, and it is the modern way of making money in the internet age: play live. Be paid upfront for your unique experience and expertise, each time, to create new products which, once completed, are free for your client to use.
See also
References
- ↑ The JC dates this to the widespread introduction of email, but the fabulous James Burke makes a good argument that it started 200 is years ago with the Jacquard loom.
- ↑ Barring a trivial amount of electricity and no I am not including Blockchain in that sweeping generalisation.