What if: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*[[Indemnity]] | *[[Indemnity]] | ||
*[[The farmer and his sheep]] | *[[The farmer and his sheep]] | ||
{{plainenglish}} | |||
{{c|drafting}} |
Revision as of 08:03, 20 April 2017
Oh, the fertile, febrile mind of a transactional lawyer.
Part of the paranoid delight of transactional drafting is catering for unforeseen contingencies. To do this, the draftsperson has many tools at her disposal: force majeure clauses, indemnities, termination rights, and a propensity to draft ornate, byzantine valuation dispute clauses.
But there remains in all of these a guiding principle: one should determinatively address contingencies now that may not predictably be resolved at the time they arise. For those contingencies, one has a simpler approach: amendment.
See also
Plain English Anatomy™
Noun | Verb | Adjective | Adverb | Preposition | Conjunction | Latin | Germany | Flannel | Legal triplicate | Nominalisation | Murder your darlings