What if: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Highly unlikely]] | |||
*[[Force majeure]] | *[[Force majeure]] | ||
*[[Chicken Licken]] | *[[Chicken Licken]] | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
{{plainenglish}} | {{plainenglish}} | ||
{{c| | {{c|Drafting|Risk}} |
Revision as of 13:04, 12 June 2018
Oh, the fertile, febrile mind of a transactional lawyer.
Part of the paranoid delight of transactional drafting is catering for unforeseen contingencies. To do this, the draftsperson has many tools at her disposal: force majeure clauses, indemnities, termination rights, and a propensity to draft ornate, byzantine valuation dispute clauses.
But there remains in all of these a guiding principle: one should only address contingencies now that cannot predictably be resolved later — that is to say, in the unlikely event they arise. For those contingencies, one has a simpler approach: amendment. For the certainty gained by catering for these contingencies comes at the cost of length, complexity, aggravation and, well, cost of finalising your contract.
See also
Plain English Anatomy™
Noun | Verb | Adjective | Adverb | Preposition | Conjunction | Latin | Germany | Flannel | Legal triplicate | Nominalisation | Murder your darlings