Hierarchy of Events - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In which the [[JC]] thinks he might have found a ''bona fide'' use for the awful legalism “[[and/or]]”. Crikey. | In which the [[JC]] thinks he might have found a ''bona fide'' use for the awful legalism “[[and/or]]”. Crikey. | ||
What to do if the same thing counts as an {{isdaprov|Illegality}} [[and/or]] a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} ''and'' an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} [[and/or]] a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}}. | What to do if the same thing counts as an {{isdaprov|Illegality}} ''[[and/or]]'' a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} ''[[and]]'' an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} ''[[and/or]]'' a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}}. | ||
Why do we need this? Remember an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} is an apocalyptic disaster scenario which blows your whole agreement up with extreme prejudice; a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} is just “one of those things” which justifies termination, but may relate only to a single transaction: it isn’t something one needs necessarily to hang one’s head about. | Why do we need this? Remember an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} is an apocalyptic disaster scenario which blows your whole agreement up with extreme prejudice; a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} is just “one of those things” which justifies termination, but may relate only to a single transaction: it isn’t something one needs necessarily to hang one’s head about. |
Revision as of 14:49, 3 August 2018
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
In which the JC thinks he might have found a bona fide use for the awful legalism “and/or”. Crikey.
What to do if the same thing counts as an Illegality and/or a Force Majeure Event and an Event of Default and/or a Termination Event.
Why do we need this? Remember an Event of Default is an apocalyptic disaster scenario which blows your whole agreement up with extreme prejudice; a Termination Event is just “one of those things” which justifies termination, but may relate only to a single transaction: it isn’t something one needs necessarily to hang one’s head about.
A Force Majeure Event is something that is so beyong one’s control or expectation that it shouldn't count as an Event of Default or even a Termination Event at all.
An Event of Default has more severe consequences for the counterparty. Well, the whole point about force majeure is that it is meant to give you an excuse not to perform your agreement. and an Illegality is only a Termination Event (one can’t be criticised if they go and change the law on you, can one?), so
See also
- Force majeure (wherein for a giggle you will find a sample ultimate force majeure clause)
- Event of default
- Termination event