Counterparts - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{gmslaanat|27.9}} | {{gmslaanat|27.9}} | ||
[[Mediocre you|Fastidious fellows]] in your [[legal eagles|legal]] department might fixate on the flimsiness of this clause. As we all know, multi-billion dollar litigation frequently hinges on the presence of absence of a [[counterparts]] clause. Here the concern is it this GMSLA version might not cover the way we | [[Mediocre you|Fastidious fellows]] in your [[legal eagles|legal]] department might fixate on the flimsiness of this clause. As we all know, multi-billion dollar litigation frequently hinges on the presence of absence of a [[counterparts]] clause. Here the concern is it this GMSLA version might not cover all the manifold varieties of way we sign and circulate legal agreements things in our modern life. I mean, [[fax]]es are a bit antediluvian aren’t they? No mention of [[telex]], for the old fogies? What about [[email]] scans? [[electronic execution]]? [[Digital signature|Digital signatures]]? |
Revision as of 14:48, 10 September 2018
GMSLA Anatomy™
|
Fastidious fellows in your legal department might fixate on the flimsiness of this clause. As we all know, multi-billion dollar litigation frequently hinges on the presence of absence of a counterparts clause. Here the concern is it this GMSLA version might not cover all the manifold varieties of way we sign and circulate legal agreements things in our modern life. I mean, faxes are a bit antediluvian aren’t they? No mention of telex, for the old fogies? What about email scans? electronic execution? Digital signatures?