Waiver of Immunity - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Structurally, sovereigns will tend to be lenders in an agency set up | *Structurally, sovereigns will tend to be lenders in an agency set up | ||
*The Borrower [[title transfer]]s away a bigger slug of {{gmslaprov|collateral}} away than it borrows from the sovereign {{gmslaprov|Lender}}. | *The Borrower [[title transfer]]s away a bigger slug of {{gmslaprov|collateral}} away than it borrows from the sovereign {{gmslaprov|Lender}}. | ||
*At any point, should the [[Sovereign]] decide to play [[who’s | *At any point, should the [[Sovereign]] decide to play [[who’s Queen]], the borrower is in the hole for 5. | ||
Interestingly, a [[pledge GMSLA]] might fix this problem by never transferring collateral to the Sovereign in the first place. | Interestingly, a [[pledge GMSLA]] might fix this problem by never transferring collateral to the Sovereign in the first place. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Sovereign immunity]] | *[[Sovereign immunity]] |
Revision as of 16:57, 11 December 2018
GMSLA Anatomy™
|
Sovereign immunity is a particular issue in an agency lending arrangement because:
- Structurally, sovereigns will tend to be lenders in an agency set up
- The Borrower title transfers away a bigger slug of collateral away than it borrows from the sovereign Lender.
- At any point, should the Sovereign decide to play who’s Queen, the borrower is in the hole for 5.
Interestingly, a pledge GMSLA might fix this problem by never transferring collateral to the Sovereign in the first place.