Unpaid Amounts - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Replaced content with "{{manual|MI|2002|Unpaid Amounts|Section|Unpaid Amounts|medium}}" Tag: Replaced |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{manual|MI|2002|Unpaid Amounts|Section|Unpaid Amounts| | {{manual|MI|2002|Unpaid Amounts|Section|Unpaid Amounts|short}} |
Revision as of 10:30, 24 May 2021
2002 ISDA Master Agreement
Section Unpaid Amounts in a Nutshell™ Use at your own risk, campers!
Full text of Section Unpaid Amounts
Related agreements and comparisons
|
Content and comparisons
Summary
If you think of an ISDA Transaction as comprising offsetting payment streams, these payments fall into one of three ontological categories:
- Been and gone: Those that are already paid: settled, gone, checked into the hereafter; on permanent location in that foreign country we call the past — we care less about these; they are but a fossil record: they pose no risk, attract no capital and excite no prospects of revenue or compensation.
- Yet to come: Due to be paid, or delivered, at a specified date in the future. Perhaps fixed; perhaps yet to be determined, but conceptually still out there. It is, conventionally, by off setting the provisional present value of these future cashflows, that we value “the Transaction” — this is what we call its “replacement cost”.
- The twilight zone: That weird inter-regnum of payments whose due date has passed, and which should have have been paid, and thus emigrated permanently to that foreign country but, for whatever reason — inattention, inability, defiance, or the affordances of Section 2(a)(iii) — they have not yet been made, so they need to be worried about, accounted for and factored into things, over and above the “replacement” value of the trade.
See also
Also relevant to the definition of Exposure in the various iterations of the ISDA credit support annex.