This time it’s different: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|systems| | {{a|systems| | ||
{{image|This time it's different|jpg|Hedgeye knows.<ref>[https://info.hedgeye.com/cartoon more Hedgeye here]</ref>}} | |||
}}{{quote|''With every single technological advance, from the invention of writing to the invention of television, those who have failed to appreciate the non-zero-sum nature of technological evolution have prophesied doom and been proven wrong. Every time, they have made some version of the argument: this time it is different, and been proven wrong.'' | }}{{quote|''With every single technological advance, from the invention of writing to the invention of television, those who have failed to appreciate the non-zero-sum nature of technological evolution have prophesied doom and been proven wrong. Every time, they have made some version of the argument: this time it is different, and been proven wrong.'' | ||
:—{{author|Venkatesh Rao}}, {{br|Breaking Smart: Season One}}}} | :—{{author|Venkatesh Rao}}, {{br|Breaking Smart: Season One}}}} | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:—{{author|Douglas Adams}}, {{hhgg}}}} | :—{{author|Douglas Adams}}, {{hhgg}}}} | ||
Stiffen your sinews if — ''when'' — you hear this one. | Stiffen your sinews if — ''when'' — you hear this one. “This time it is different”. This time, the fact that [''Here insert inconvenient but basic operating assumption of life on Earth that hitherto has spoiled the plans of dreamers and fantastist with unerring regularity''] doesn’t matter. Our new [''here insert machine/technique/technology/philosophy''] consigns these unwelcome consideration to the past. We are in a new [[paradigm]]! previous assumptions no longer hold! | ||
He’s not proud of it, but in his wild, early years, the JC spent a time in the company of a British coven of [[vampire squid]]s. It was the early noughties. He remembers one little tadpole lolling around his cubicle, waving a PetVan, or BluBeenz, or [[Lexrifyly]] [[red herring]] in his face, frothing, eyes rolling in their sockets and muttering over and over I HAVE SEEN THE FUTURE. The JC flipped a few pages — prospectuses were only three hundredf pages on those days, so you could lift them unaided — and remarked, “but it has no forecasted revenue, let alone profit, in the next nineteen years. It even says so in the prospectus.” | |||
Young Renfield — for that was his name — convulsed in bubbling, convulsive laughter . | |||
“You fool,” he cried. “Revenue is ''irrelevant''! This is the ''internet''! There is no money any more! Money is irrelevant! Everything is free! We are liberated! There are no bricks and/or mortar! we are going to be rich!” | |||
So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely they map to the [[reductionist]]s, who believe in a [[determinism|determinist]], [[algorithm]]ic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will ''not'' be different. | So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely they map to the [[reductionist]]s, who believe in a [[determinism|determinist]], [[algorithm]]ic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will ''not'' be different. | ||
Line 25: | Line 32: | ||
No? | No? | ||
===Prior times it ''seemed'' to be different, but ''wasn’t''=== | |||
*FTX has none of the traditional systemic risk of centralised finance because ''crypto''. And Sam Bankman Fried’s parents worked in compliance, so there’s that. @ Everyone 2021. | |||
*Millennial investors have changed the rules of finance forever because [[bitcoin]], memestocks, [[NFT]]s, [[Reddit]] and so on. — Every hot take ever on [[Twitter]], 2021. | |||
*We have eliminated boom and bust. — © Gordon Brown, April 2000. | *We have eliminated boom and bust. — © Gordon Brown, April 2000. | ||
*It’s the end of history. We [[libtard]]s have won. — © Francis Fukuyama, 1992 | *It’s the end of history. We [[libtard]]s have won. — © Francis Fukuyama, 1992 | ||
Line 36: | Line 44: | ||
*The machines are going to take over, breed us in slimy pods as battery fuel for Skynet which the machines will need because um they just will. Look! [[Chess]]-playing supercomputers! — © {{author|Daniel Susskind}}, {{br|A World Without Work}} | *The machines are going to take over, breed us in slimy pods as battery fuel for Skynet which the machines will need because um they just will. Look! [[Chess]]-playing supercomputers! — © {{author|Daniel Susskind}}, {{br|A World Without Work}} | ||
*Everyone is going to be nice to each other now Generation Z is in control and we have taken out and shot all the old white men. — © Every millennial, and millennial apologist ever, 2018 -. | *Everyone is going to be nice to each other now Generation Z is in control and we have taken out and shot all the old white men. — © Every millennial, and millennial apologist ever, 2018 -. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} |
Revision as of 12:36, 12 November 2022
The JC’s amateur guide to systems theory™
|
With every single technological advance, from the invention of writing to the invention of television, those who have failed to appreciate the non-zero-sum nature of technological evolution have prophesied doom and been proven wrong. Every time, they have made some version of the argument: this time it is different, and been proven wrong.
What’s truly amazing about these times is that we have more access than ever before to material that demonstrates the continuity and repetitiveness of history, including evidence of the insistence by critics of all eras that this time is different, yet so many still buy into the pyramid scheme that we are special. It is both self-aggrandising and self-exonerating; it feels right.
- —Lauren Oyler, London Review of Books
“And then, one Thursday, nearly two thousand years after one man had been nailed to a tree for saying how great it would be to be nice to people for a change, one girl sitting on her own in a small café in Rickmansworth suddenly realized what it was that had been going wrong all this time, and she finally knew how the world could be made a good and happy place. This time it was right, it would work, and no one would have to get nailed to anything.
Sadly, however, before she could get to a phone to tell anyone about it, a terribly stupid catastrophe occurred, and the idea was lost forever.”
Stiffen your sinews if — when — you hear this one. “This time it is different”. This time, the fact that [Here insert inconvenient but basic operating assumption of life on Earth that hitherto has spoiled the plans of dreamers and fantastist with unerring regularity] doesn’t matter. Our new [here insert machine/technique/technology/philosophy] consigns these unwelcome consideration to the past. We are in a new paradigm! previous assumptions no longer hold!
He’s not proud of it, but in his wild, early years, the JC spent a time in the company of a British coven of vampire squids. It was the early noughties. He remembers one little tadpole lolling around his cubicle, waving a PetVan, or BluBeenz, or Lexrifyly red herring in his face, frothing, eyes rolling in their sockets and muttering over and over I HAVE SEEN THE FUTURE. The JC flipped a few pages — prospectuses were only three hundredf pages on those days, so you could lift them unaided — and remarked, “but it has no forecasted revenue, let alone profit, in the next nineteen years. It even says so in the prospectus.”
Young Renfield — for that was his name — convulsed in bubbling, convulsive laughter .
“You fool,” he cried. “Revenue is irrelevant! This is the internet! There is no money any more! Money is irrelevant! Everything is free! We are liberated! There are no bricks and/or mortar! we are going to be rich!”
So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely they map to the reductionists, who believe in a determinist, algorithmic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will not be different.
All the data piling up, pointing determinedly backward as it does, viewing the the unfolding universe in its rear-view mirror as the great agglomeration of instantly stale information we collect about everything that has already happened that it necessarily is, including as it does every fuck-up, even though unanticipated fuck-ups outweigh predictable successes 1,000:1, surely should tell you, if it tells you anything at all, that there will be fuck-ups.
People will be disappointed. People will lose money, in unpredictable and predictable ways. The universe will not be suddenly better disposed to the same wilful, wistful, wishful, misty-eyed optimism that it has hitherto crushed like a bug at every opportunity.
For, however measly, paltry and useless the data have collected is, however infinitesimally tiny a subset it is of all possible data, in all times, at all places and through all dimensions, anywhere in the total space-time of our multi-hued universe, the one thing it tells us, the single inference we can, with sparkling clarity, draw is that there will be fuck-ups.
So isn’t it the richest of dyspeptic ironies that these millenarian, futurologist, reductionist thought-leaders, data pioneers all, somehow manage to extrapolate from this catalogue of resounding woe, that the forward plan for this new fangled-idea is different .
No?
Prior times it seemed to be different, but wasn’t
- FTX has none of the traditional systemic risk of centralised finance because crypto. And Sam Bankman Fried’s parents worked in compliance, so there’s that. @ Everyone 2021.
- Millennial investors have changed the rules of finance forever because bitcoin, memestocks, NFTs, Reddit and so on. — Every hot take ever on Twitter, 2021.
- We have eliminated boom and bust. — © Gordon Brown, April 2000.
- It’s the end of history. We libtards have won. — © Francis Fukuyama, 1992
- How you value businesses without reference to cashflow or profitability. — © every investment banker ever, in the run-up to the dotcom bust in 2000
- We have efficiently allocated risk to those best placed to bear it through credit derivatives. — © every investment banker ever, in the run-up to the global financial crisis, 2004-8
- Mark-to-market accounting of future income streams in a market that doesn’t exist yet is sensible. — © Arthur Andersen[2] Jeff Skilling and the crazy gang at Enron, continually up to October 2001
- The Singularity is definitely going to happen, and the universe will wake up, rewriting the laws of physics as we know them etc. — © Ray Kurzweil, 2005.
- Software is eating the world. — © Marc Andreessen, 2009
- The machines are going to take over, breed us in slimy pods as battery fuel for Skynet which the machines will need because um they just will. Look! Chess-playing supercomputers! — © Daniel Susskind, A World Without Work
- Everyone is going to be nice to each other now Generation Z is in control and we have taken out and shot all the old white men. — © Every millennial, and millennial apologist ever, 2018 -.
See also
References
- ↑ more Hedgeye here
- ↑ Who? Ed.