Unpaid Amounts - ISDA Provision
2002 ISDA Master Agreement
Section Unpaid Amounts in a Nutshell™ Use at your own risk, campers!
Full text of Section Unpaid Amounts
Related agreements and comparisons
|
Content and comparisons
Summary
If you think of an ISDA Transaction as comprising offsetting payment streams, these payments fall into one of three ontological categories:
- Been and gone: Those that are already paid: settled, gone, checked into the hereafter; on permanent location in that foreign country we call the past — we care less about these; they are but a fossil record: they pose no risk, attract no capital and excite no prospects of revenue or compensation.
- Yet to come: Due to be paid, or delivered, at a specified date in the future. Perhaps fixed; perhaps yet to be determined, but conceptually still out there. It is, conventionally, by off setting the provisional present value of these future cashflows, that we value “the Transaction” — this is what we call its “replacement cost”.
- The twilight zone: That weird inter-regnum of payments whose due date has passed, and which should have have been paid, and thus emigrated permanently to that foreign country but, for whatever reason — inattention, inability, defiance, or the affordances of Section 2(a)(iii) — they have not yet been made, so they need to be worried about, accounted for and factored into things, over and above the “replacement” value of the trade.
General discussion
Template:M gen 2002 ISDA Unpaid Amounts
See also
Also relevant to the definition of Exposure in the various iterations of the ISDA credit support annex.
References
You may want to know where Unpaid Amounts feature in the ISDA Master Agreement. The answer: In Payments on Early Termination: Section 6(e)(i) (for Events of Default) and 6(e)(ii) (for Termination Events) and 6(e)(iv) (Adjustment for Illegality or Force Majeure Event).
Spoddy point for old-fashioned 1992 ISDA hipster types: if “Loss” is your chosen means of close-out valuation, the concept of Unpaid Amounts is more or less factored into the definition of Loss:
- Loss includes losses and costs (or gains) in respect of any payment or delivery required to have been made (assuming satisfaction of each applicable condition precedent) on or before the relevant Early Termination Date and not made, except, so as to avoid duplication, if Section 6(e)(i)(1) or (3) or 6(e)(ii)(2)(A) applies...[1]
This is why the drafting of the Default provision (paragraph 6) of the 1995 CSA is as tortuous as it is. If you were wondering.
References
- ↑ There is a magnificent piece of ISDA discombobulation here: Section 6(e)(i)(1) and (3), and 6(e)(ii)(2)(A), all deal exclusively with agreements where Market Quotation, and not Loss, applies. So there is, in fact, no risk of duplication, since the definition of Loss is entirely irrelevant to these parts of the agreement.