Requirements to deliver excess Collateral - GMSLA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 17:42, 5 September 2016 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Paragraph 5.6 is the clincher in the "aggregate portfolio collateralisation" netting analysis started in paragraph 5.4. It means you don't have to gross up collateral flows across portfolios of longs and shorts.

Sections 5.6 and 5.7 need to be read together (and also see GMSLA Netting)

Template:Gmslasnap

Commentary


5.6 in a Nutshell (GMSLA edition)

5.6: Where Collateral values are aggregated under paragraph 5.4 and, on any day, both Parties would otherwise have to deliver Collateral to each other, the respective Market Values will be set-off and, in full settlement of both parties’ obligations, the Party having the larger delivery obligation must deliver Collateral having a Market Value equal to the difference.

view template


See Also

update to anat|gmsla

Navigation
2010 GMSLA 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · Schedule · Agency Annex · Addendum for Pooled Principal Agency Loans

2018 Pledge GMSLA 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · Schedule · Agency Annex

Stock lending agreement comparison: Includes navigation for the 2000 GMSLA and the 1995 OSLA

Index: Click to expand:

2010 GMSLA: Full wikitext · Nutshell wikitext | GMLSA legal code | GMSLA Netting
Pledge GMSLA: Hard copy (ISLA) · Full wikitext · Nutshell wikitext |
1995 OSLA: OSLA wikitext | OSLA in a nutshell | GMSLA/PGMSLA/OSLA clause comparison table
From Our Friends On The Internet: Guide to equity finance | ISLA’s guide to securities lending for regulators and policy makers