Manufactured payments in respect of Non-Cash Collateral - GMSLA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
(Redirected from 6.3 - GMSLA Provision)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2010 Global Master Securities Lending Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Resources and navigation

2010 GMSLA: Full wikitext · Nutshell wikitext | GMLSA legal code | GMSLA Netting

Pledge GMSLA: Hard copy (ISLA) · Full wikitext · Nutshell wikitext |
1995 OSLA: OSLA wikitext | OSLA in a nutshell | GMSLA/PGMSLA/OSLA clause comparison table
From Our Friends On The Internet: Guide to equity finance | ISLA’s guide to securities lending for regulators and policy makers
Navigation
2010 GMSLA 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · Schedule · Agency Annex · Addendum for Pooled Principal Agency Loans
2018 Pledge GMSLA 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · Schedule · Agency Annex

Stock Loan owner’s manuals: 2010 GMSLA · 2000 GMSLA · Pledge GMSLA · OSLA

Index: Click to expand:

Clause 6.3 in a Nutshell

Use at your own risk, campers!
6.3 Manufactured payments in respect of Non-Cash Collateral
Where Borrower provides the Lender with Non Cash Collateral over an Income Record Date Lender must, on the date the Income is paid, manufacture an equivalent amount of Income to Borrower that Lender would have received on that Non Cash Collateral had it held it on the Income Record Date and not been entitled to any Tax relief on that payment under Applicable Law.

Full text of Clause 6.3

6.3 Manufactured payments in respect of Non-Cash Collateral

Where Non Cash Collateral is delivered by Borrower to Lender and an Income Record Date in respect of such Non Cash Collateral occurs before Equivalent Collateral is delivered by Lender to Borrower, Lender shall on the date such Income is paid, or on such other date as the Parties may from time to time agree, pay or deliver to Borrower a sum of money or property as is agreed between the Parties or, failing such agreement, a sum of money or property equivalent to (and in the same currency as) the type and amount of such Income that would be received by Lender in respect of such Non Cash Collateral assuming Lender:

(a) retained the Non Cash Collateral on the Income Record Date; and
(b) is not entitled to any credit, benefit or other relief in respect of Tax under any Applicable Law.

Related agreements and comparisons

Related agreements: Click here for the same clause in the 2018 Pledge GMSLA
Related agreements: Click here for the same clause in the 1995 OSLA
Comparison: Template:Gmsladiff 6.3
Comparison: Template:Osladiff 6.3

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Content and comparisons

Template:M comp disc GMSLA 6.3

Template

Summary

Template:M summ GMSLA 6.3

Template

General discussion

Template:M gen GMSLA 6.3

Template

See also

Template:M sa GMSLA 6.3

Template

References

There is quite a lot of hedging around with conditionals — “the amount the Lender would have received had it held...” — that looks quite unnecessary — and truthfully, is — but is designed to cater for the details freak/paranoid weirdos in the legal department, because (a) being a title transfer agreement, the Lender is not obliged to, and may well not, hold on to any collateral it has been delivered, and thus may not be entitled to interest on the Collateral at all, and (b) the Lender is only obliged to manufacture the payment if the Collateral Issuer actually makes the payment, and not if it is obliged to make the payment, but then fails to (because it has blown up, for example.

So there's a sort of four way matrix here to determine whether a Lender has to manufacture a payment.

Manufactured income matrix Lender held Collateral Lender reused Collateral
Issuer made payment Yes Yes
Issuer failed payment No No

Snafu under the 2000 GMSLA

Note this is all somewhat complicated under the 2000 GMSLA because the drafting committee rather muffed their job. See Clause 6.1 re Manufactured Payments.