Counterparts - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{gmslaanat|27.9}}
{{gmslaanat|27.9}}
[[Mediocre you|Fastidious fellows]] in your [[legal eagles|legal]] department might fixate on the flimsiness of this clause. As we all know, multi-billion dollar litigation frequently hinges on the presence of absence of a [[counterparts]] clause. Here the concern is it this GMSLA version might not cover the way we do things in our modern life. I mean faxes are a bit antediluvian aren’t they? What about email scans? electronic execution? Digital signatures?

Revision as of 14:29, 10 September 2018

GMSLA Anatomy™


In a Nutshell Clause 27.9:

27.9 This Agreement can be executed and delivered in counterparts. view template

2010 GMSLA full text of Clause 27.9:

27.9 This Agreement (and each amendment in respect of it) may be executed and delivered in counterparts (including by facsimile transmission), each of which will be deemed an original.
view template


2010 GMSLA: Full wikitext · Nutshell wikitext | GMLSA legal code | GMSLA Netting

Pledge GMSLA: Hard copy (ISLA) · Full wikitext · Nutshell wikitext |
1995 OSLA: OSLA wikitext | OSLA in a nutshell | GMSLA/PGMSLA/OSLA clause comparison table
From Our Friends On The Internet: Guide to equity finance | ISLA’s guide to securities lending for regulators and policy makers

Navigation
2010 GMSLA 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · Schedule · Agency Annex · Addendum for Pooled Principal Agency Loans

2018 Pledge GMSLA 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · Schedule · Agency Annex

Stock lending agreement comparison: Includes navigation for the 2000 GMSLA and the 1995 OSLA

Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


Fastidious fellows in your legal department might fixate on the flimsiness of this clause. As we all know, multi-billion dollar litigation frequently hinges on the presence of absence of a counterparts clause. Here the concern is it this GMSLA version might not cover the way we do things in our modern life. I mean faxes are a bit antediluvian aren’t they? What about email scans? electronic execution? Digital signatures?