If in doubt, stick it in: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


Better advice: ''[[murder your darlings]]''. Or, as our brethren [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] would say, [[murder your darlings|subject one’s darlings, or procure that such darlings are subjected to, culpable homicide]].
Better advice: ''[[murder your darlings]]''. Or, as our brethren [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] would say, [[murder your darlings|subject one’s darlings, or procure that such darlings are subjected to, culpable homicide]].
There are two kinds of pointless things we habitually stick in contracts: absurd asks by the risk team, which all at the coalface know will be just as habitually rejected by any counterparty advisor with a pulse, even if the senior risk team draw come kind of delusional comfort from the fact they such terms are being sought at all; the other is matters of tedious compliance — be they accommodations of [[Prime brokerage disclosure annex|misconceived pedantries buried in developing regulation]] or internal [[policy|policy overreactions]] brought about during the recovery process from [[blunt trauma]] — in either case resulting in gnomic confections piped into the back end of your contract templates like so much kitchen dirt swept under a rug, only to fossilise there, unloved, undisturbed, until overlaid with yet more scar tissue.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Why are contract forms so long?]]
*[[Negotiation oubliette]]
*[[Negotiation oubliette]]
*[[Credit department]]
*[[Credit department]]

Navigation menu